I am puzzled at how those who call this a Christian nation do not want our troops to come home from Afghanistan or Iraq. I am puzzled by the fact that my father applauds one of his preacher friends who ascends to the pulpit dressed in the character of Patrick Henry and reenacts his famous speech, ending with a booming, “Give me liberty or give me death.”
How is it that we have come to see this fighting spirit as part of our Christian heritage? Where does it come from?
Not Jesus.
As Tolstoy rightly observes, when Jesus says to turn the other cheek, he is calling for a radically different way of facing the enemy. As a matter of fact, taking up arms - even to defend your freedom - doesn’t appear to be anywhere on Jesus’ list of priorities. Though not Christian, Gandhi managed to use this principle to drive the British out of India. Martin Luther King Jr. did the same in the American South.
The problem with this approach to the enemy, to turning the other cheek, is that it hurts. It hurts and it feels not only like defeat, but like a shameful admission of weakness. But is this not what Jesus says Christians must not do? Do not strike back, he says. If they take your coat, give them your shirt also. Is Nietzsche right when he sneers at the Christian soldier rattling his sword and says the only person who has the right to call himself a Christian is one who behaves as the Galilean did?
Every year at this time I teach the Old English epic poem "Beowulf." I like the story of Beowulf and Grendel and the story of Beowulf and the dragon. I find the seemingly unrelated stories of the blood feuds that swirl among the Swedes and Frisians and Franks and Danes and Geats a fascinating look into that brutal and bloody world. More than that I think what I love is the glimpse I get into the Anglo-Saxon culture of the poet as Christianity moves in and mixes with - to eventually overtake - the pagan beliefs of the time.
The poet appears Christian. He bemoans the “pagan shrines,” where the Geats and the Danes “vowed offerings to idols,” but insists, “That was their way … The Almighty Judge of good deeds and bad, the Lord God … was unknown to them.”
His Christianity is mixed with the old beliefs however. He writes that Grendel is of “Cain’s clan, whom the Creator had outlawed and condemned as outcasts…” and goes on to explain that “out of the curse of his exile there sprang ogres and elves and evil phantoms, and giants who strove with God...”
We might chuckle at that, as a belief from the so-called dark ages, one we have left behind. But what about the poet’s sympathy for the heroic way of life? When asked why he thinks he can kill the monster, Beowulf brags of rising from battle boltered (a great Northern Irish term which means clotted and sticky) in the blood of his enemies. The poet approves. But he also seems to sense that this warrior life is the very thing Christianity has arrived to destroy.
But did Christianity destroy that old way of life, or did it absorb it? After all, Christians in my hometown are putting snake flags on their cars, declaring, “Don’t Tread On Me.”
The fighting spirit goes way back. It is without a doubt part of Northern Europe's - and hence much of America's - illustrious heritage. It just isn’t the part that comes from Christ.
(Illustration from "Stories of Beowulf" courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.)





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (13)
When it comes to declaring the hope that is in you do not bring the sword and make them believe. Turn the other cheek.
The only justice I see Christ mandating is social justice- feeding of the hungry, caring for the sick, loving your neighbors.
Cherry picking the Old Testament for sound bites to justify modern motives diminishes us.
Who was Christ? Did He take up arms or fight? Only once, against usury in the temple- against capitalism in the name of His Father- against corruption where faith is debased by greed and laziness.
The Man allowed Himself to be led to His own unjust execution.
And we say that "The government has been given the sword for a purpose"? As if the government is a Christian entity endowed by God.
Justice/vengeance are not ours. Instead, we need to be looking out for our neighbors as Christ did command.
Please give me the verse where Christ says He came to abolish the Law and the Prophets?
From the Genesis through the rest of the Old Testament, war was seen as a way to rescue the perishing (Abraham rescuing Lot before the Law or Prophets, Esther rescuing her people) or as instruments bringing the Israelites back to their Lord.
Governments are not (necessarily, although they can be) Christian entities, but they are endowed by God, even wicked ones (please see Romans 13:1, and 1 Timothy 2:1-3).
Vengeance is not ours; but justice is something we should emphatically pursue as the people of God. Sometimes this will mean armed conflict. Most of the time it does not; it means Spiritual conflict.
Hebrews 8:6-13
King James Version (KJV) 6But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. 7For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. 8For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: 9Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. 10For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: 11And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. 12For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. 13In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Lots of countries even now have a semblance of peace, but are still seething with hatred for countries and cultures bordering them (and oftentimes, even despise those within their borders too). May I suggest that the Lord is as displeased with this outward-yet-not-inward peace just as much as He is with injustice?
The fact remains, that Jesus came to fulfil the Law and the Prophets, not to abolish them. As there are still many prophecies left unfulfilled (not a few of them dealing with war), and as there are many seeking to wage war (even in God's name) even at this hour, this is an important distinction.
For those of us who claim the name of Christ, it is imperitive that we not march off to government-decreed wars thoughtlessly, happily, to merely maintain our own creature comforts. I will not say that we should never march.
“The Bible is clear here: I am to love my neighbor as myself, in the manner needed, in a practical way, in the midst of the fallen world, at my particular point of history. This is why I am not a pacifist. Pacifism in this poor world in which we live – this lost world – means that we desert the people who need our greatest help. What if you come upon a big, burly man beating a tiny tot to death and plead with him to stop? Suppose he refuses? What does love mean now? Love means that I stop him in any way I can, including hitting him. To me this is not only necessary for humanitarian reasons: it is loyalty to Christ’s commands concerning Christian love in a fallen world. What about the little girl? If I desert her to the bully, I have deserted the true meaning of Christian love – responsibility to my neighbor.”
Like with pagan warrior Beowulf---the real purpose gets a whitewash by who's telling the story.
When we set aside that mythology for a moment, we realize that we've been guilty of not just deserting many people of the world to Schaeffer's bully when helping them wasn't in our "national interest," but of actively supporting the bullies when it suited our purposes. And sometimes—as with our enslavement of Africans and our genocide against Native Americans—we have been the bullies and profited greatly from our bullying, the penance for which we still have yet to even begin repaying as a people.
Moreover, as Christians, we need to be engaged in a constant critique of the "freedom" that our leaders send our military to defend and sacrifice their lives and mental and physical health for.
If it's the "freedom" to continue to use 25% of the world's energy, despite being only 5% of its population, I wonder if that really fits into God's vision of freedom. If it's the "freedom" to have more stuff for cheaper because our multinational corporations are "free" to exploit workers in the Global South, I question whether we would tell Jesus to His face that we think that is the freedom He came to bring. If it's the "freedom" to make a wreckage of our planet by pumping more oil out of it, refining that oil, and then burning it to put more carbon and poisons into our air, I ask whether the Holy Spirit is found anywhere in that "freedom."
It's far too easy to glibly say "we're defending freedom" or "we're stopping a bully," while not stopping to ask if the freedom we're defending is part of God's vision of freedom, or whether we're propping up another bully or being a bully ourselves as we purport to be stopping one. Christians should be at the vanguard of the critical voices, constantly asking these questions, always refusing to blindly follow, always seeking the truth.
Put it this way, as a husband with children, if someone enters my house and the only way to stop him is violence, I am obligated to defend my family. Now if I kill a guy with no reason then I will be judged for unrighteous killings especially in front of my wife and kids.
Beowulf captures many elements of Christian faith reinterpreted in Scandinavian Hero Fashion. Beowulf does not have a Baptism of water but rather has one of blood (Boltered as this article notes.) He is a water walker and comes by boat to rescue them from the descendants of Cain when their pagan shrines fail. The strong theme of Babel, and the Atheling decadence waking the evil is clear. Actually I wondered if Beowulf was killing the right monsters.
When the Christian faith is brought to other nations it often gets cultural alterations and additions that end up becoming part of the landscape of that culture sometimes obviously, sometimes in more subtle ways, sometimes rather lavishly. Look at all the sword wielding Saints.
If violence is responded to with non-violence, the action is still turning the other cheek. Particularly in countries which uplift Christian morals yet treat people groups immorally, the practicing on the oppressors of those words which they have (often) long-preached to those they oppressed, is even more important. Gandhi's letting the British know what he was doing highlighted not just the Empire's oppression, which the British people could always blame on a powerful monarchy or on vague, faceless parliamentarians, but each individual's underlying hypocritical attitude, i.e., "I hate this race/person/creed and know the Bible says to love my enemies, but I agree with treating them as sub-humans anyway."