Is it appropriate for a church leader to publicly question Christianity and the Bible? That's apparently what happened when Kent Dobson, a respected Bible teacher here in my corner of Michigan, appeared on a Discovery Channel program that raised questions about the historicity of the Bible. Dobson resigned under pressure from the school board and some concerned parents:
Dobson, the 31-year-old son of retired Calvary Church pastor Ed Dobson, resigned his post as Bible teacher at NorthPointe Christian High School last week after the school board questioned his role in the March 16 special, "Jesus: The Missing History."On the hourlong program, Dobson questioned biblical scholars on possible contradictions between the Gospels and the historical evidence of Jesus' life. The questions included:
- Was Bethlehem Jesus' birthplace?
- Was Jesus a carpenter or a stone mason?
- Was Jesus' eviction of money changers from the temple a political or religious move?
- Is there any truth in the Gnostic gospels?
In the program, which is not scheduled for rebroadcast, Dobson does not definitively answer the questions or take a position. He interviews biblical scholars who present evidence that contradicts the Bible.
It was quite a shock to see this in the newspaper this weekend—I don't know Kent personally, but he did contribute a few posts to ThinkChristian back in 2005. The problem, it seems, is not that Dobson doesn't believe in the Bible, but that in the Discovery Channel program, Dobson doesn't strongly answer or settle some of the difficult questions he raises. Here are a few clips from the program—keep in mind that these are just those clips that presumably caused the controversy, and aren't displayed in their full context:
A series of emails from the school board and community shows that the situation is predictably messy and complicated, and while I'm sympathetic to Kent and have a great deal of respect for his work, I don't want to comment much on this case because I don't know all the facts. Hopefully he and his church community will work this out in a Biblical manner. However, this bit—from an email by an upset parent—stood out and points to a broader question (emphasis mine):
We understand that this was done with unbelievers and that parts of this were edited.
The part that actually concerns me that as a Christian the Bible was questioned. The Bible is never to be questioned!
Why as a Christian would one place himself in this type of situation where we would actually be questioning the Bible.
I'm not sure how I feel about that. I don't know any Christian who hasn't, at some point, questioned God and the Bible—whether it's out of honest doubt or angry skepticism, most people have asked these questions. But is it different when a Bible teacher raises these questions without offering a definite answer to them? If your local Sunday school teacher publicly raised questions like this, would it upset or worry you? Should kids see their adult leaders asking these questions out loud, or is that potentially harmful to their faith?
That's a lot of big questions... but what do you think?





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (25)
We need to stop putting up with the rhetoric of the fundamentalists who pretend to have a moral or Biblical high ground by using such slogans as this, or as "I believe the whole Bible and take it literally". They can only claim this because they read the Bible in English translations that smooth over difficulties for them, and don't know the Bible in sufficient depth and detail to know what the real issues are. Yet they have the audacity to claim that their approach is superior to that of people who recognize the problems not because they are less spiritual, but because they know the Bible better.
Concerning Jesus' profession, this is not a matter of questioning the Bible. It's merely a question of what the word "tekton" actually means. According to the Louw and Nida lexicon, "one who uses various materials (wood, stone, and metal) in building — ‘builder, carpenter.’ ... There is every reason to believe that in biblical times one who was regarded as a tekton would be skilled in the use of wood and stone and possibly even metal." It may be shocking to some to think of Jesus as a stone-cutter, but the Greek clearly permits this translation.
Similarly, the motive behind Jesus' temple action is not a matter of questioning the Bible. It's not as if the Bible told us precisely what Jesus' thoughts are as he takes on this action.
Likewise, the Bible doesn't tell us that there is no truth at all in the Gnostic gospels, though their central assumptions are obviously not consistent with Scripture.
I would distinguish between challenging the veracity of Scripture and challenging traditional interpretations. I think we as Christians need to be firmly committed to the Bible as God's reliable word to us. Therefore, we should be eager to understand it accurately, even if that means rejecting traditional interpretations.
"Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly." (NIV)
the issue here is that Kent is in a position of authority on God's word.
I think a lot of it depends on the spirit in which questioning is done, and it depends on your fundamental posture towards God's revelation. Any questioning should be done in the spirit of truth and humility, submitting ultimately to God's revelation of Himself, not as we would have Him or have history be.
But as Sheldon points out, there is a whole other dimension to this issue when you are talking about people in positions of authority. Our sermon this week was on Jesus' warning that it would be better to be drowned in the sea then to cause another sin. This is a warning to be taken very seriously before a leader of any kind begins asking questions which could scandalize and damage the faith of those in his or her care. If they are questions which may lead to a deeper faith and understanding. But if they are questions which will only lead to further doubt and darkness - I don't a spiritual leader should ever lead someone in that way, even if it be the path they are struggling on themselves.
There are three kinds of "christians"
those who think everything is the bible is literally true, and koala bears were on the ark. (the bible is totally perfect/divine)
those who think we cannot know anything for sure, so we should love. (the bible is human/fallible)
and the third....those who have experienced Jesus and use the bible as the origin and touchstone of faith. just because we have learned that there was no literal adam and eve does not mean that Jesus did not rise from the dead and transform all of history.
the bible is both awesome and able to connect you to god. it is also an earthen vessel, just like all of us. Why would god become flesh if the "important" stuff was coming out in hardback with footnotes?
Jesus is the final WORD. the bible is just the written, inspired by god record of the people of god experiencing god.