A good teacher knows where he wants to take his students but begins where they are. A teacher who can’t speak the language of his students won’t be able to teach them his. And this is one of the key features of Christianity. It sneaks into a culture wrecked and dysfunctional and cures it from the inside. I thought about this a lot this semester teaching Mozambican young men about the epistles of Paul. In Philippians and Titus you can see so clearly the contrast in approach he uses to address different cultural ills. In Philippi, a Roman colony where the culture worshiped power and despised those of lower station, Paul presents Christ as the Emperor of all Emperors who attained his position not through power-grabbing but through humiliation. On the wild isle of Crete where men were lazy and ignorant savages, Paul presented the model of an overseer as someone of moderation and education.
In the trajectory of the Gospel’s influence you will see invasion, syncretism, transformation, and often decay. I come from the USA where Christianity’s influence is waning. But, I work in Mozambique where Christianity is at the stage of syncretism, absorbing Christian Kingdom concepts and joining them to traditional values. Every good Christian thinks his own Christianity is good. That is, he thinks that his worldview is that of the Bible. But it’s not. We are colorblind to the influence of our own culture tinting our theology. This can lead to nationalistic versions of the faith, each interacting with, changing and being changed by the dominant worldview.
I thought about this a lot this week reading My Utmost For His Highest. Oswald Chambers (pictured left) writes in wartime to young men who might the next day face fire in the trenches. That context gives his writings a distinctly patriotic and almost macho swagger. He talks often about sports and battle metaphors. We must “buck up” and “take risks.” The same thing happened during the next World War in the writings of CS Lewis. His radio addresses were to a nation troubled by the threat of invasion and he often sounds to me like he’s giving Churchillian pep talks from a Christian perspective. Now in this century, America is seeing a surge of religious fervor/patriotism fighting the twin perils of a shifting public worldview and a menacing external threat. This leads to unfortunate slogans like JesUSAves and even a newly released, American Patriot’s Bible with an American flag on the cover.
One benefit of the global village is that we can see how others are absorbing Christianity. Is it syncretism or cultural transformation? It’s a little bit of both and as long as imperfect people are being redeemed by a perfect God we will see a spectrum of Christianities. Not for us to judge, but rather to look to our own hearts, where the Holy Spirit is transforming men created of dust and trained on the rough playground of life into the likeness of Jesus Christ.





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (24)
"I follow the teachings of Christ Jesus as told in the bible and will defend all who profess to be Christians. I will not defend those who say they are Christians to get a vote".
"Protect and Defend" those that agree with your religious belief and refuse to defend and protect those that don't. I'm sure Jesus would think that's a great idea. Did he teach that philosophy in the Bible? So much for "love thy neighbor". I mistakenly thought His approach was:
You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. (Matthew 5:43)
Once again, it is the Christian dogma that you promote which makes me very proud to be Buddhist.
These are the people John is supporting, honest recipients of God's unmerited favor. John hesitates to support those that simply assume a Christian mantle in order to gain support for their political positions. Who can support or philosophically defend those that wrap their hateful right wing (or left wing) Ideology in a cloak of pious Christianity. That is a tactic of the Klan and some left wing liberation movements.
As a soldier you are sworn to protect and defend all the citizens of this country. The military does not check your religion or race before taking up arms to protect it's citizens.
If that is the case, then yes, I have misunderstood John. I speak as someone who has been steadily told that what I believe is wrong (Buddhism) and that I need to change. I have had a great deal of disrespect shown to my beliefs, even while showing great respect and support for the beliefs of others. I have dealt with the attitude that because I am not Christian, then my opinion and my value is less. So, when I read John's post, I heard more of the same.
I read this post, as a Buddhist, to gain greater understanding of other people's beliefs and attitudes. I feel the more I know, the better I can understand their perspective. I will state that I was raised Christian then became Buddhist about 10 years ago. But I do attempt to gain greater understanding of others' beliefs as the years have brought me greater perspective and a more open mind.
So, thank you Rick for the post and I apologize if my understanding of John's post was incorrect. I also have issues with those who simply use religion as a front in order to gain popularity or support. If that was the essence of the post, then I agree completely.
i live in the Phils and as i read the posts here, there are really differences. issues that you wrestle with like culture war, homosexuality etc are not so much big concerns here. but the thing is, i do learn a lot from the articles and from the various points of view. i think this is the essence of being church. that we can all learn, struggle and live in God's grace together in spite of or even amidst our different contexts and culture.
thanks for an insightful post.
What makes Christianity so great is that we can find statements in the Bible to shore up our own worldview and be comforted by not being judged by others who call themselves Christian. It's a wonderful Gospel--whatever that might mean to each of us.
I looked, and I found a woman. I find it interesting that all your examples are, well, as you say, "macho". Where do women fit into this understanding of Christianity? Should we also celebrate more feminine readings of God's word?
http://speakeristic.blogspot.c...
http://speakeristic.blogspot.c...
I'm also trying to gently suggest that you avoid using the male generic in the future, as it makes some of us left out.
I think there is a corollary trend in our churches the feminization of worship with gooshy Jesus Is My Boyfriend songs (but that will have to keep for another post).
I am always mystified by this concept of feminizing Jesus or the Church. Usually the inarticulate hairy knuckled preacher assigns poetry, art and ballet to the feminine side and war, football and beer to the masculine side. But I am a 100% red-blooded male, never watch football games and have painted for years and write and read poetry. As do my two sons and many of their friends. Think of the poet, spontaneous dancer and “gooshy” songwriter David or Bezalel the artist who was the first person in the Bible who was said to be “Filled with the Holy Spirit”. I think such arbitrary misogynist categories betray a lack of intelligence or education. I am not accusing you of this, I just disagree with the arbitrary categories of masculine and feminine.
Like Rick, I'm skeptical of people who complain about the church being too "girly" but I'm also very sensitive to when female experience is excluded.
So I wonder then, what is a good theology of Nation? What does appropriate Christian patriotism look like, whether that be American, Canadian, Nigerian, or Iraqi Christian patriotism?
I have some not particularly well-integrated angles on this:
First, our nations are gifts of God, much like a family. They are both second to God's New Family, the church, but gifts to be loved, cherished, and honored nonetheless.
Second, Governments of all sorts are part of God's creation to keep order and restrain sin in our broken world. They are accountable to Him for abuses, and generally speaking, deserve our respect much as parents do. (Restraining evil is also the basis of military service and just war, but let's leave that off for now.)
Third, the cosmos and human culture are good creations of God, thought twisted by sin. Therefore we are called as redeemed people to redeem them as God intended them to be as much as we can.
Anybody else have a good theology of patriotism?
Second, there is no such thing as Christian patriotism. Christians can be patriots, as long as we remember that governments (at best) derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, who all fall short of the glory of God. Therefore, we may at times have to act as the conscience, rather than the pep band, for our rulers. Incidentally, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, atheists, among others, can also be good patriots, although their witness to the nation will be different.
Finally, as to C.S. Lewis, he made a very clear point that for the salvation of a man or woman's soul, s/he could be a pacifist or a patriot, and, either one could be used to secure said soul for "our father below." Is his patriotism selfless, or egoistic and opportunistic? Is the pacifism based on trendy shallow rebellion, or is it the sincere conviction of a person of great physical courage? I didn't find The Screwtape Letters to be Churchillian propaganda at all.
I am aware of the history of Crete but I'm taking at face value Paul's less than flattering comments about the Cretans that either reflected prejudice or first-hand experience.