On our summer vacation, my friend Ron was dreaming up a series of short videos to explore some church-goers' foibles and bad assumptions. We spent some time chatting about worship--what it's for, why we do it, how it's structured, what the point is.
After months of percolation, this weekend he posted the results.
So, are you a Church-Goer? Or a Worshiper?
GATHERING
RENEWAL
WORD
TABLE
SENDING





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (14)
Any Christian advert that makes it point by mocking or belittling somebody with different values or varying spiritual maturity levels seems patently non-Christian to me. The intent (albeit, inadvertent) of these commercials is to poke fun at those who "don't get it." I've found that, while it may work for Apple and Volkswagen, appealing to a person's insecurities is an ultimately fruitless way to inspire growth. These commercials reek more of high-school's "in crowd" flaunting their position. They just does so in a high-brow way.
Where does the creator of these videos see himself? Does he see himself as a "dweeby church-goer"? I doubt it. If he did, I doubt he'd paint such an ugly caricature of them.
I don't really see God getting too much glory out of commercials like these. Cool, free-thinking, modern, self-aware "worshipers" look pretty good, but the overall body of Christ get's a pretty good black eye.
While I may not enjoy the sophistication level of these videos, the points are very valid and I resonate with them. Perhaps these are points that need to be made to the Body of Christ.
1. Church is not entertainment, its not a show.
2. We don’t gather together to get fed, but to offer worship to God and fellowship with other believers. 3. Worship is not just about the 30 minute lecture we call the sermon.
4. Appearing outwardly religious, wearing your Sunday-go-to-meeting clothes, is a trap and doesn’t impress God.
I think the idea here is to use a humorous iconic platform to do some basic teaching about worship. It's better than a lecture.
And I would suggest that we are all both church-goers and worshipers, and these characters are more two sides of one's personality than trying to make fun of some external group.
Then if one is an enthusiastic pursuer of making videos or of worship, then amateur it is.
I know you asked a different question than "what do you think about these videos?" so I have to apologize... but I'm going to answer the question you didn't ask. :-P
I think the reason people are so "harsh" is that they are a little tired of the smarminess that comes with some emergent leaders telling the established church that they've been doing it wrong lo these many years. Paraphrasing the Internet Monk (since I can't find the article in his archives), it's not good just because it's new, but that's something a strong contingent of the emergent church seems to believe. And while your friend used the videos to present "two sides of one's personality" (as per your interpretation), that's not always the case; people with strong orthodox beliefs or practices are ridiculed as out of touch, or whatever. The holy grail in a lot of worship has become cultural relevance über alles, which means those people that don't chase that dragon are the clueless "church-goer" from the videos.
So which am I? Hopefully I'm neither of the stereotypes portrayed in the videos.
Plus the plink-plank-ing of the toy piano was a bit on the...well, toy piano side.
I think Christ would be spitting us out of his mouth because we don't do what he asked.
If it takes producing videos that step on peoples' feelings to get them to wake up and start reaching the lost, worshiping God, and becoming transparent rather than pursuing 'religion' then so be it!
I wouldn't disagree that the church, in its collected and individual states, has failed in many areas. I'm sure some churches and Christians' instances, Christ is just rolling his eyes saying, "Come on!" Others though, I bet he's pumped and excited to see their focus and desire to know more about him.
It has divided us into two separate churches who just happen to share one roof. The staff stands behind the new service 100% because it has the potential to "bring so many new people into our church". The youth pastor even recruits young people on his facebook page but he never mentions that we also offer a traditional service.
Why do we have to change Christianity to suit today's lifestyle preferences? Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Realize that if you went to Peter and Paul’s “Christian” church, you’d be wearing a ragged cloak, no underwear, belt and sandals to church and sitting next to people who have never heard of a tooth brush. You’d be singing wierd a-tonal middle eastern music (they had neither our Western musical scale nor melodic sense) played on the 4 stringed Oud. Do you think they wear ties and business suits in Heaven? Just wondering.
The goal for Paul was not that he should ensure his own comfort, but that he win the most people to Christ. Although I am 59 and raised in the Church as it sounds that you have been, I have made a committment to change and adapt as worship styles and music changes. I refuse to stop changing and cling to old comfortable ways.
Appropriate business attire has also changed. I haven’t worn a tie to a business meeting in years and a suit would be considered out of place in most business meetings. Regarding music, realize that Mick Jagger is now 66 years old. Loud rock and roll has become the music of old people, just as Lawrence Welk and Bing Crosby was to may parents! Wacky huh! That truth was made patently clear to me one time 2 years ago when I went to an old folks home to minister and Miles Davis was being played over their music system.