There's been quite a few articles written lately about a trend in England where people, apparently 100,000 plus, are becoming de-baptized. The current attention probably comes from the fact that National Secular Society is selling official certificates to denounce baptism. (They're the same group who did a bus ad campaign with the slogan, "There's probably no God. Stop worrying and enjoy life") The Church of England has brought a little of the attention to themselves as well telling folks who want to be taken off the baptism records the church doesn't remove names, but can make amendments if someone makes a public statement saying they want to be de-baptized.
In all of the publicity, there are some real issues to look at. Of course there's the debate of infant versus adult baptisms. Those who are fans of child dedications say baptism should be reserved for when someone is old enough to make their own commitment to Christ. In the child baptism realm,de -baptism is sort of the natural opposite to making a commitment to Christ as an adult. Parents made a decision for the child. They grow up and are old enough to say they don't believe. While it's not what we would hope for, it's what happens. And there are eternal consequences.
For me, I'm less concerned about how many people buy a de-baptism certificate and more focused about how to reach out to these people who are clearly in need. One of the Christian responses I've seen online is the "I am a Christian" campaign. It's a website where people can declare their faith. But is this the right response? Is it appropriate to say, "Oh you don't believe? Tough for you. I do. I'm saved. See, my name's on a website" I would guess it's this kind of reaction that turned off many of the de-baptism folks in the first place.
What are your thoughts on the de-baptism movement? How should we react as Christians?





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (21)
I need some clarification on your statement that I do not understand please. You said that, I'm sure that there "will" be those who "will" be accepted by God on the day of judgement, who "will" profess their sins and repent
Are you saying that there will still be a chance to be saved after death if only if they profess their sins and repent at the day of judgment?
but this also poses a unique opportunity for us to engage this people in a meaningful dialogue. we as christians will learn a lot from them it terms of their discontent, frustration and pain that led them to a need to broadcast their stand against the church. then we can truly understand where they're coming from. and hopefully, we can heal together in the light of God's truth and by the leading of the Holy Spirit. this is a tedious process and we should be wise in making these steps. this should not result in another culture war, where we further alienate them from the true faith and we fall into pride instead of being salt and light to them.
i believe this is going to be, if not already, a worldwide phenomenon.
My short version "Honor God,Finish Well"
If the person involved was baptised as a child, then there is a school of thought that the baptism is actually an act of dedication and promise by the parents, and that being "de-baptised" should really be a decision by their parents, not them. Being officially de-baptised is, no doubt, a really hurtful thing for the parents.
If the person involved was baptised as an adult, then this is a very sad thing, but I don't think trying to prevent them making this statement is likely to bear any fruit.
Interestingly, the Church of England now has an official service of "re-dedication by immersion" to allow for people that were baptised as infants to confirm their faith through an official service of immersion. It's not all bad news ;)
Furthermore, the church understands that we make these promises on the part of the church universal—that is, everyone in the church makes this covenant, whether or not they are present at the particular baptism ceremony. (Of course it has a particular efficacy in the local congregation where that promise will be fulfilled.)
A person cannot be “de-baptized” because it’s not just about him/her! The church has promised itself to support that person—a promise that may not ever be vitiated by the person's wish to become "de-baptized."
That said, Jerod’s question is spot on: how do we reach out to these persons? Well, we can start by remembering to keep our promises.