Who's to blame for the economic crisis currently sweeping the globe? Democrats, Republicans? Socialists, capitalists? Greedy banks, greedy consumers? Most everyone I've talked to has a theory about whose failed policies or bad ideas damaged the U.S. market, but I'd not read a serious attempt to stake out a specifically Christian perspective until I read The Freedom of the Christian Market, an essay at Reformation 21 by Carl Trueman.
There's a lot to digest there, but his basic point is that as Christians, we have a unique perspective on this (and any) market crash: it's not the result of any one specific actor or policy; it's simply what happens when fallible humans devise a market system that is based on the economic needs, desires, and decisions of fallible human beings. Trueman words it more eloquently:
So who is responsible for the current disaster? We all are. We are all complicit in a world that has increasingly taught people that value in life is a function of the market. This is not a return to the Great Man Theory of history; none of us as an individual carries all responsibility; but just as every mass event in history is both the result of macro-economic and social forces, and the result of countless individuals behaving in particular ways, so this crisis is both a product of our times, and an action in which we have all had a hand. We are all complicit in creating and fostering a culture of material acquisition, and a world which, in order to ensure insane levels of economic growth, instills insane levels of material aspiration in its people. [...] And we are not victims of this; we are all at best hapless and willing dupes, at worst active perpetrators, whether borrowers or lenders; we are all part of a system that is designed simultaneously to satiate greed and exacerbate avarice.
Trueman's argument is not that we should all become anti-free-market anarchists or start calling for a glorious revolution against the Man. Rather, he suggests three changes in attitude that Christians should adopt in reaction to market turbulence:
- Recognize that a free market is the "best" way of organizing an economy only insofar as it's not as bad as communism, fascism, feudalism, or other methods. (Reminds me of Churchill's quote about democracy—it's the worst option, except for all the others.)
- Don't attach moral qualities to impersonal market systems. Trueman puts it: "Markets have no morality above and beyond that which is exhibited in the lives of those who buy and sell in them; and as these people are fallen, we should not be surprised that the markets ultimately reflect that fallenness."
- Avoid playing the predictable "blame game"—as Christians, we know any problem with the market runs much deeper than one political party or piece of legislation.
What do you think? Is this a healthy—and more specifically, a Christian—way to approach an economic crisis? Is it accurate and helpful to say that we're all to blame for the crisis... and if so, how do we go about "fixing" market problems when we can't "fix" our sinful nature?





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (15)
Perhaps if Christians became more skilled in the personal talents given to each of us, seeking jobs that we truly enjoy and that benefit others, rather than living primarily as consumers, we would see a change not only in the economic market, but also our churches and our witness to the world?
"This world is not my home...I'm just a-passin' through..." In the meantime, I'm trying to be a good steward of what God has given me. The "blame" for the current economic situation can be shared by many, but maybe we can move beyond blame to living out our faith even more so more people can see the value of eternity...
I find the summary of Trumans points odd.
Point 1 made above very much depends on perspective, if you live in a rich country which benefits from free market activity this may be the conclusion, but not from the context of a sweat shop in india which is on th wrong end of a impersonnal free market which drives at profit margins and then regulates with consequences for the poorest in the world.
Point 2: I agree that markets are not of themselves evil, but expliotation of people using these market systems is offensive to Christians and I believe to the Lord. As people are involved regulation is essential. "All that is required for evil to prosper is for good people to do nothing."
Point 3: Not convinced this point helps anything
I supect repentance for our collective and individual greed as western people and particularly as christians would be an appropriate response with an intent to protect the poor and honour the Lord in so doing.
It is a serious injustice, especially when it was used by the rich to exploit the poor. The Bible is very clear about exploitative lending (called usuary). When we see attempts to fix this system by bailing out the perpetrators, the penny should drop! Pretty soon, this catastrophe is going to seriously affect third world nations and impede charities who assist the poor.
We have some breathing space before the effects of this disaster become more obvious, but let's not soften on our duty to protect the marginalised and call their oppressors to account, as Wilberforce did.
What we are seeing at the moment is a serious injustice, especially when this system was used by the rich to exploit the poor. The Bible is very clear about exploitative lending (called usuary). When we see attempts to fix this system by bailing out the perpetrators, the penny should drop! Pretty soon, this catastrophe is going to seriously affect third world nations and impede charities who assist the poor.
We have some breathing space before the effects of this disaster become more obvious, but let's not soften on our duty to protect the marginalised and call their oppressors to account, as Wilberforce did.
There are certainly issues with the ethics of the economy. A Christian response is one that cares primarily for the people, not the system. With the caveat that the system does affect the individual. His second point is important. A fallen system is going to be fallen. And I don't think that a completely moral system is possible short of the new creation. But that doesn't mean we can't work to make it better. Classical economists say that there should be virtually no restrictions on the ability to make a contract. But pretty much everyone agrees that there should be child labor laws (which in economic terms is a restriction on the ability of the employer to make a contract with the employee).
His third point is odd. I think I understand his point. That no one thing has caused the economic problems and I agree with that. But the third point could also be construded to say that we should not question the system, which I wholeheartedly disagree with. The system should always be questioned. (But you should actually spend some time learning about it as well so that the questions are helpful, not just antagonistic.)
Now can we really say, don't worry about money? I don't think so. I am not interested in living on a hillside, or wandering homeless, or being given a flat by the council (local governments don't do that in the US, and I don't think in Canada either). John Wesley's sermon on The Use of Money has been cited here before, and is a good reference. He advises, gain all you can, but not at the expense of life or health, then save all you can, then give all you can. Our current problems are that we have prioritized money over life and health, our own and others, in many ways, saved next to nothing, and had little left to give. "We" is not a mass of people acting identically. Individual greed and willingness to live on debt is one thing, unscrupulous lender are another, and so on. I remember a commercial not too long ago advertising that you can cut your monthly payments by hundreds of dollars with the "Quicken Smart loan." Only for a fleeting second do they note that it is an "interest only" loan. Evil to offer it, gullible accomplice to desire it.