From rebellion to… responsibility?

Ran across an interesting book review today of Sam Anderson's Five Lives, which charts the lives of five famous cultural rebels: Arthur Rimbaud, Emily Post, Hugh Hefner, John Lennon, and Eminem. It's a motley crew, but their life trajectories share many elements in common. All lacked attentive fathers in their youth, and all burst onto the scene with shocking or challenging moral messages and then struggled for the rest of their lives in the shadow of their initial outbursts. From the review:

All five of these figures warmed their hands around a common fire: the public performance of morality. Fatherlessness seems to have frozen them in a kind of permanent adolescence. They answered adult questions (How should one behave?) prematurely and exaggeratedly, then stubbornly clung to those answers for life. Their careers were built entirely on bad manners—whether excoriating them, glorifying them, or reveling in them. They sacrificed their lives to oversize visions of righteous living. And while they all have their own special failures and triumphs—that’s what makes them fit for biography—the saddest figures, to me, for precisely opposite reasons, are Rimbaud and Hefner. The French poet burned through his world-stomping revolutionary phase in less time than it takes most people to finish college. By 19, he was facing a whole second lifetime of pure sad, unheroic frustration: He wound up in Africa, trying unsuccessfully to get rich, and died of very painful cancer at 37. Hefner, on the other hand, still clings to his adolescence. At 82, he brags of being a “babe magnet” and collects young platinum-blonde “girlfriends.”

Sounds like a fascinating book. And it makes me wonder about the firebrands of Christian history and how their lives played out. Who's your favorite Christian "rebel"--and after they arrived loudly on the scene of Christendom, how did they live out their lives? Did they quietly work in pursuit of their original message? Did they flame out dramatically? Or spend the rest of their lives slowly backing down from the message or theology they preached in their (spiritual) youth?

unrelated note: This is the 2000th post on TC! Thanks to everyone who's read and contributed thus far!

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (2)

I'm lost in that I didn't know that any of these people were proclaimed Christians. Saying that we all stray at times in our stewardship of what has been generously given to us. It just makes me think that it would be our responsiblity to seek these people out and bring them back to God. Paul met some of the most odd people to ever assemble around a church and he continued his attempts to bring them all to the church and to Christ Jesus. In God's Grace John
When C.S. Lewis wrote The Problem With Pain in the 1940's he presented an argument for suffering that was logical, Biblical and somewhat dispassionate. By the 1960's when he wrote A Grief Observed after his wife Joy died Lewis wrote more emotionally and compassionately about the subject. He didn't back down from his message about God but he did offer a more compassionate approach for the suffering to process their pain.

A Grief Observed is a personal journey that is not afraid to leave questions unanswered. I found it more vulnerable and approachable than The Problem With Pain. Lewis was honest about his own doubt and depression, about his own struggle to reconcile what his head knows to be true about God with his breaking heart. This is a brave risk for a guy who makes his living offering apologetic for God. He could have made himself more of a hero by writing a book about how faith negates feelings instead of being honest.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now