Good news about gas prices?

We all love cheap gas. Watching the “sale” meter out race “gallons” at four times the pace and then seeing the hefty total can produce a slight feeling of shock.

For me, vivid memories from my childhood of an oil crisis of decades past began to surface. Turmoil in a faraway place called “the middle east” caused per-barrel prices to head skyward. The sacrosanct $1 per gallon mark was pierced. Cars stretched for blocks around gas stations as rationing strategies were put into place. I recall cultural anxiety akin to the post Sept. 11th kind - our entire way of life was under threat.

So, the recent news that prices might be headed downward again soon might be something that should be celebrated as welcomed relief. Or should it?

The truth of the matter is that in the long term, we would be better served by even higher prices. At $4 per gallon, gas really isn’t that much more than 30 years ago, once inflation is considered. And, think of how we have organized our lives around the availability of cheap fuel. Take for example, the city I live in, Seattle. We take tremendous pride in being “green,” so many people do commute by bike and public transportation. But, beneath the surface, our lives still depend on many car trips. When my kids were as young as 8, their recreation-level soccer teams began playing clubs located all over the city, up to 30 minutes away, when there was plenty of able competition nearby. I rarely, if ever, saw families arriving together.

Data confirms that our driving patterns have begun to change with the recent price spikes and there are reports that demand has already begun to slide. However, large-scale transformation will only occur if prices reach a level at which it’s not just the poor and middle classes who bear most of the sacrifice. We are still a long ways from the point at which key decision makers in business and government will have be motivated to act. Sustained higher prices provide the only real economic incentives to break our addiction to gasoline and to encourage the development of other energy and transportation sources. In addition to possible environmental and health benefits, alternatives lessen our dependence on oil from parts of the world that are hardly known as havens of democracy or human rights.

On a more personal level, we might just become better stewards if gas costs more. In place of starting our engines, perhaps we’ll walk or bike more, which is good for our physical well-being. Perhaps we’ll share rides and shop and even fellowship locally, which is beneficial for strengthening our communities. Furthermore, the strain on our budgets may force us to reevaluate how we spend our money. Perhaps we’ll buy less or say no to activities that keep us running (make that, driving) around like busy fools. We may even re-organize the when and where of our activities (like kids soccer games).  Maybe we’ll even rethink our place on the planet. After all, why do I feel entitled to cheap gas when $4 would seem like a giveaway to Europeans? All of this seems good for our spiritual lives.

To be certain, expensive gasoline will cause undeniable pain in the near term. The cost of just about everything will rise, possibly stalling our long-awaited economic recovery. More importantly, people on the lower end of the economic scale can least afford to pay more for fuel, so we will need to find innovative ways to share the burden.

As we are slowly learning about government deficits, however, serious problems that affect future generations won’t go away simply by pretending they don’t exist. Nor can we solve them without deeply shared sacrifice. The real value of paying more at the pump is easy to miss if we focus on price alone.

(Photo courtesy of Sura Nualpradid.)

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (5)

We might be better off, but the assumption is also that we all live and work in a manner better served by modes of transportation or in areas designed around multi-modal transport schemes. Unfortuntately, that isn't the case, and even with the growing sizes of metropolises, we aren't seeing the landscape change to give incentives to those alternate modes of transport.

I like to ride. And aim to at least plant myself in areas where stewarding my body and resources works out better. But, there are downsides to such closeness as well, which we'd also have to be as ready to steward no matter the cost of living.
So if we agree that gas should cost more—if for no other reason than to include in the cost of a gallon of gas all of the externalities related to auto travel that are right now being either subsidized by those of us who don't drive very often, or being subsidized by future generations when the pollution and climate change bill comes due—what can the Church do to mitigate the effects of higher gas prices on the poor, who often drive older cars that aren't as efficient, and who are more and more often (particularly in cities) priced out of the "transit hub" areas, which are quickly gentrifying with new urbanist developments for middle-income people?

Might it be time to bring back the "church bus," but on a much larger scale, maybe with "park 'n' rides" much closer to neighborhoods from which the church draws for less walkable communities? Perhaps encourage carpooling by church members by "un-paving" a few church parking lots and turning them into community gardens (which could then feed the poor—another mandate from the Gospel)?

On a larger scale, is it time to see the promotion of mass transit and community planning that allows for multiple modes of transportation as a social justice issue that God commands the Church as a whole to involve itself in? Is it time for the Church to stand up in city council meetings or planning commission meetings, or to physically stand in acts of nonviolent civil disobedience, against planned developments that don't provide a full transportation menu—including options for walkability and mass transit—to occupants or patrons?

With every mile we drive on cheap gas, we build up debts—a debt for the building and maintaining of roads, a debt for the pollution our cars spew into the atmosphere from raw materials mining through manufacture and operation, a debt for the pollution and massive environmental damage (like the Gulf oil spill) caused by the continued drilling for and refining of petroleum, a debt for the political, social, and economic violence wreaked upon the people of the two-thirds world in order to keep the petroleum flowing to the USA, a debt for every coughing asthmatic child whose family can't afford to live anywhere but right by the freeway, a debt for the moral and social damage done to our communities by the atomization of the individual in a closed automobile and shielded from interaction with others, a debt for the massive death and devastation that will be inflicted on future generations as a result of climate change.

I believe it's a moral imperative for the Church to see to it that those debts are paid by those who owe them—not by others in this generation who make healthier choices, or by those in future generations who will suffer from our choices. But I also believe that many people have been denied the economic opportunities to make other choices, so it's also the moral imperative for the Church to see to it that the poor and the workers don't suffer for the choices the marketplace, created by and for the benefit of the wealthy and powerful, has imposed upon them.




Oh I agree with jamesggilmore.  We need to go back to the horse and buggy days.  In fact, let's just scrap all of civilization and go back to prehistory when man lived in total oneness with nature.

I'm reading "The Fatal Shore" about how Australia was colonized.  The author reviews what we know, and don't know, about the Aborigines.  They were naked, spread fish oil all over themselves for protection against mosquitoes, and therefore stank so badly that even 18th century British sailors voluntarily refused to attempt "relationships" with the woman.  Oh, and woman were valued solely by Aborigine men for sex and food gathering. 

But I'm sure their impact on the environment was negligible.  Oh for the good old days!
Dan, I think jamesggilmore and the author are both  presenting a modern---futuristic, even---picture of urban/suburban life, not advocating horse & buggy use.  Lancaster Co. PA is a rare alternative, although I have heard of folks in western US riding horses to work and school, to save on gasoline.   Can US society sustain current levels of consumption and automobile use---let alone deal with gas prices?  Europe in general, American urban centers, are using public transportation as a practical even necessary alternative to increasing traffic jams, travel times, smog, rising costs, etc. A step back, or a step forward? (and just when we had paved over all the street-car/trolley lines . . . .)
My reading of Fatal Shore also included a brutal 18th cent. Brit. penal system, colonists who hunted Aborigines for sport, when they were'nt enslaving them---and recall that Brit women of the time were hardly better off socially in their own culture. Ingenious use of (hygenically-challenged)sailor-repellant by the Aborigines---I think they also used tea-tree oil (melaleuca) as a cure-all beyond anything the civilized nations possessed.
If people want to build themselves their version of utopia, they can.  But I read the author and commentators to demand that their utopia be forced on everyone else.  I'm personally not interested in living in it or paying for it.

I'm not defending the British.  But too many people like to idolize prehistory without having the slightest idea of what it was really like.  "The Fatal Shore" presents a small picture of it, and it's not pretty.  Gas is one of the things that has allowed us to advance far beyond prehistory, and I have no desire to go back. 

I also reject the idea that we have to solve a problem before it exists.  There is no shortage of oil in the world, in fact new sources constantly become available.  Shortages today are the result of gov't restraints on the market.

But if/when the day comes that prices rise because oil becomes less available, that will be the day that alternatives become viable.  Problem solved, without any artificial interference.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now