It’s not you, it’s me: pronouns and discipleship

Want to really get to know someone or find out what makes them tick? Just listen to their pronouns.

That's the approach of James Pennebaker, psychology professor at the University of Texas and author of the new book, "The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us." Pronouns, says Pennebaker, reveal all sorts of characteristics and assumptions about the person talking.

Using the words "I," "me" and "myself" a lot, Pennebaker argues, doesn't necessarily mean the speaker has a big ego and sense of self-importance. It's actually the opposite: the person is being more open, vulnerable, honest and willing to reduce social distance. This is why a person of higher social status actually uses the words "I" and "me" less than someone of lower social status when the two are speaking to each other - the higher-status person wants to preserve the distance that sets them apart. And so Pennebaker's list of people who use "I" and "me" at higher rates might surprise you: women more than men, "followers" more than "leaders," someone telling the truth more than someone who is lying, someone who is afraid more than someone who is confident, and so on.

Someone should take Pennebaker's theories and try to apply them to Christian discipleship. It would raise all sorts of interesting questions to investigate. Do Christians, in the process of becoming less selfish and more compassionate - dying to self and rising with Christ - actually say "I" and "me" more often? If so, is it because they're less worried about their status and more about being vulnerable and open to serving others? Do pastors follow the same patterns of "I" and "me" use that Pennebaker sees in politicians and CEOs, and for the same reasons? Western Christians get criticized for their individualism and weaker sense of the church, but should their use of "I" in talking about their faith not be held against them?

I wonder if asking questions like these could also help us ask new questions about the book of Psalms. I've always been amazed by all the first-person references in a book of poetry beloved by a non-individualistic society - a chosen people - and read and heard exclusively in the presence of other believers. We may read Psalms privately today, but no one in ancient Israel did. So was it strange for them to hear the words "I" and "me" so often when they heard the Psalms?

Scholars say the first-person pronoun in the Psalms may have reflected a collective sense of self or a way to connect private emotion to public worship. Maybe now there's one more answer, not from a Biblical scholar but a psychologist: all those "I" words in the Psalms reflect honesty and vulnerability, voiced by a poet and a people learning to shrink their own importance and open themselves to God and to the world.

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (5)

I (!) love this post. Viva la first person!
Pronouns are very important.



Exodus 3:14

“And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.” 

God presents himself as the ultimate first person singular, present tense, block caps, in the lives of his people.  Fast forward.... In John 10:30 Jesus says “I and my Father are One.” 

When the Psalmist weeps and pours his hear in the first person I, does he not also speak a truth that God, the ultimate “I” weeps too. 

Part of the “I” for every God centered Christian is not ego but a humble realization that they submit to and find their peace dwelling in the “I” of God.
I think the author is correct that as Christians find a closer relationship with their true faith they use language that reflects a personal I/me nature which is also less accusatory and better accepted than the You/They language. Everyone slips of course but in general I believe this to be true.

JMHO
I think this is so true. SPeaking and writing in the first person reflects a willingness to risk vulnerability. I think that  unity and repore. It challenges us to take responsibility for our thoughts and feelings which actually builds common ground. The opposite so often builds walls, creates tension and potentially sounds accusational. Besides all this one of those "back in the day" english challenges which I remember my teacher drilling in was : Write from the first person, this was the thing repeatedly impressed on me. See I remember some stuff that's important! ;)
Thanks for this! Very "I" opening post! Blessings!
I am very encouraged by this article. I wish I could say more.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now