Mama, don’t let your boys grow up to think like ‘Transformers’

There is an embarrassing, unfortunate moment in “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” that reveals what is perhaps the most troubling aspect of this critically reviled, audience-beloved franchise.

As a few characters are getting a tour of a collection of vintage automobiles, the collector (Patrick Dempsey) points out, in a drooling tone, the seductive curves and lines of the vehicles. Meanwhile, the camera ignores the cars completely and instead slowly pans up the body of the series’ new, designated babe (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley).

Herein lies the real problem with the “Transformers” movies. It’s not the idiocy of the plots. It’s not the incompetence of the action sequences. It’s not the increasingly brutal violence.

It’s the sexism.

As that scene makes all too clear, series director Michael Bay can barely distinguish between a woman and a vehicle. This has been the case for all of the movies (in the second installment, a villainous robot even took the form of a sexy coed before it was obliterated). But it wasn’t until “Dark of the Moon” that I began to think about how damaging this is – especially for the franchise’s younger fans.

Relax, you might say, what action movie doesn’t objectify its female characters a little bit? Boys will be boys in this genre, the thinking goes, and women will be boy toys.

First and foremost, however, such thinking runs counter to Biblical teaching. There’s a lot of debate about how Ephesians 5:21-22 should be interpreted, but I’m sure we can all agree that it doesn’t mean women should be equated with machines. Bay may be in awe of the female form, but his line of thinking is about as far away from the understanding of imago dei as one can get.

What’s especially distressing about the unbiblical objectification of “Transformers” isn’t so much that it exists (when it comes to movies, that’s a battle that will never be won as long as there is sin). Rather, the real concern is who this distorted worldview most influences.

The “Transformers” franchise began its pop-cultural life as a 1980s toy (comic books and a cartoon would quickly follow). In other words, kids’ stuff. The new, PG-13 movies are pitched to an older demographic, but blockbusters don’t make this much money by appealing only to one segment. Little kids are going too, often brought by parents who remember the toys from their own childhood and see the movies as a nostalgia-tinged bonding experience.

Watching “Dark of the Moon” surrounded by male teens and some younger boys, I began to understand the insidious way sexism gets its hooks into us. This isn’t one of those bad habits we pick up later in life. It’s an attitude that’s instilled very early on - by the adult examples we witness and the media to which we’re exposed.

So make no mistake, “Transformers” isn’t escapist entertainment. I’ve heard parents who feel better about the movies because they feature very little actual sex. True, but that’s an insidious bait and switch: one distasteful element is swapped out for another that is actually sneakier and more dangerous. If you ask me, “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” would be better for everyone if it had more sex and less sexism.

(Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures.)

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (28)

A U2 song reportedly features twice in the first half-hour of Transformers 3.  This is yet another Satanic summer blockbuster -- like last year's Iron Man 2 (ACDC, Highway To Hell) which I also did not see.
I saw this movie last week, with my hubs, but not my boys.  The first scene has a lot of sexual innuendo! 

I can't buy into this statement >> If you ask me, “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” would be better for everyone if it had more sex and less sexism.  I think it would be better off if it had neither.  Because really, is premarital sex better than sexism?

On a good note, I think they did a good job of making the Cassey more than a trophy.  She had {some} brains and wasn't all boobs.
I honestly think Michael Bay is about 12 years old. 

That's not an insult, either -- I honestly think he's a boy trapped in the body of a man, and is only making movies through some sort of Chauncey Gardiner-esque series of coincidences.
What if it had less sex and less sexism? The cartoon seemed to do okay with that combination, if I remember correctly.
This reminds me of a comment my pastor made this past weekend. He said he was watching a violent movie with "lots of blood and guts," as he likes his movies, when suddenly there was a sex scene. He said he was appalled and didn't expect to see such a thing.

Observations like these walk the line between hilarious and depressing. Why, as Christians, should we have no problem watch violent movies (whether it be Transformers, or Braveheart, or James Bond, or whatever), but we're revolted by sexual material? There are entire organizations designed to protect ourselves against pornography (e.g., Covenant Eyes), but you don't see grown men struggling with the concept of playing violent video games.

In my opinion, you can't condemn one without the other.
That's exactly what I was thinking. Saw the movie last night and was highly disappointed when the opening scene is the two young people in bed. This movie was innappropriate about sex in many ways, and it really left you with the idea to have it all you need big money, fast expensive cars, a sexy girlfriend, and a job at the top (straight out of school) to really be complete. And the fight scenes were unending it seemed...crashing of metal together for long, long sequences. Not really much of a story outside of the battles and sex theme. Now the love story is lacking as well, as this boy is willing to DIE for this girl...but in the end, he makes it clear even though he is living with her, he is not ready to marry her.
Saw the movie last night and was highly disappointed when the opening scene is the two young people in bed. This movie was innappropriate about sex in many ways, and it really left you with the idea to have it all you need big money, fast e...xpensive cars, a sexy girlfriend, and a job at the top (straight out of school) to really be complete. And the fight scenes were unending it seemed...crashing of metal together for long, long sequences. Not really much of a story outside of the battles and sex theme. The love story is lacking as well, as this boy is willing to DIE for this girl...but in the end, he makes it clear even though he is living with her, he is not ready to marry her.
So, Iron Man 2 is satanic because of... rock & roll?

It might be so for other reasons, but music isn't one of them.
I haven't seen the film, but what you described reminded me a lot of my initial reaction to sitting in the theater for The Social Network. And since there's a few to choose from, I'll be specific: when Mark creates the "hot or not" website that shuts down the server at Harvard.

Success and superficiality and selfishness subliminally linked together in one cinematic montage.

It is what seeps in that tends to take the deepest roots in our hearts and minds.
Interesting comparison Chelsey. I remember Social Network taking some heat for its portrayal of women. I wonder, though, if you felt the movie endorsed the characters' attitudes toward women, or simply offered those attitudes as character traits? The Transformers movies unabashedly endorse the view of women as nothing but machines made for male pleasure, which is why I find them so distasteful.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now