Happy Hallow…I mean Reformation Day. Just 491 years ago, Martin Luther, upset at indulgences of the church, posted his 95 Theses on the Castle Church doors in Wittenberg, Germany setting the Reformation in motion. His theology put importance on the Bible as the only infallible source of religious authority and the fact all baptized Christians have universal priesthood, meaning a direct relationship with God.
As Christians, I think we would agree the reformation was a good thing. Luther did other great things in his life, including writing hymns and translating the Bible. But along with the good came some bad. Historians say Luther was an antisemite who believed Jews' homes should be destroyed, their synagogues burned and their money confiscated. Luther showed compassion for Jews, accordning to historians, but only to try to convert them.
So where does that leave us? Do you denounce a man who did great things because some of his personal beliefs were hateful? In today's culture it's not uncommon to see the media focus on one part of a person's life and paint it as an extreme. Actors, politicians and Joe the Plumber is either all good, or all bad. But God sees all of us and all of our sides. Even though we have bad pieces, can't God still use us for good? Afterall, in Romans 3:23, the Bible says "For everyone has sinned; we all fall short of God’s glorious standard."
What do you think?





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (13)
But that's not to say he wasn't a tool in God's plan. And it's not to say that he didn't have a sincere heart for Christ.
Also, where is the source of Luther sill believing in indulgences and purgatory? From what I understand these were huge issues with him and the Roman Catholic church and what the 95 Thesis addressed. Can you point to source material for your views?
We must stop shunning but rather tell the truth to our Catholic brothers while they must give everybody a chance by listenning to their protestant brothers, for we are blessed to agree on the most important and vital truth that christ is the one and only God.
As for the great Martin Luther, he was a sinner like all of us, yet another truth which re-affirms, as the bible says, that no one but God is to be worshipped.
We all fall short. That is why we need him.
anyways, he concluded (in not so many words) that God is constantly in the business of using sinful people to further His kingdom here on earth. We need only look from Moses to David, to Paul and a number of people in between to see that that is exactly how God works. And of course we are always to remember that we all fall short of the glory of God yet he still uses us despite ourselves. I personally think that Luther was antisemitic and undoubtedly a sinner, but that doesn't negate God's use of him to develop the church.
I must start by saying I am not a historian and the following is only a guess. But from what I understand, Luther first reached out to Jewish people with the gospel. It was largely rejected. Then, it was later in life that he wrote an anti-Semitic text. (He also became extremely negative towards the pope and Catholicism.)
So, how do you feel when you reach out to someone with the gospel, but they reject it? What if they have arguments that you find difficult to defeat? Do you ever get defensive and bitter? I don't know if that's what happened to Luther, but I know it happens to me. I don't mean to justify Luther, but I remember that I am capable of the same evil. This reminds me to throw myself at God's feet and depend on Him to transform me.
I have been inspired more by the teaching of John Wycliffe, who really laid the foundations for Christians to disagree on silly things like doctrine, because we have no earthly overlord but Jesus, we each have a direct line to God, and we must each read and understand Scripture for ourselves. Before Luther, Christians who departed from Roman rule, such as the Albigensians, were slaughtered. Wycliffe, although unmolested during his lifetime, was taken from his grave to be burned by a later inquisition. Calvin, although no Lutheran, benefited from the reduced power of Rome, resulting from Luther's stand. I am more Methodist than Lutheran, more sympathetic to congregational church governance than any bishops or councils, but without Luther, the heavy secular hand of the Popes might still stifle and oppress us all. Even the subsequent history of the Roman church has been blessed by the need to recreate itself in response to the Reformation.
This is a dark side of Lutheran history. The ELCA in 1998 officially denounced these works of Luther, after a movie of his quotes from "Jews and Their Lies" was shown publicly.
Like many Lutherans who were raised to think of Luther as a Saint, I had no idea about all this until recentlly.