Have you been following news about Pope Benedict's visit to the US? There are a lot of issues he'll undoubtedly address before the visit concludes, but the one that's attracting the most attention is the ugly history of sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic church. He's already made some comments on the issue, although given the gravity of the scandals, one suspects and hopes that he'll have more to say in the next few days.
It's tempting to see these horrible instances of sexual abuse within the church as a "Catholic problem," something unique to the Catholic church and its clerical hierarchy. And of course there's the "it could never happen here" line of reasoning (and that's a hard line to resist—I can't imagine a sexual abuse scandal happening in my church, even though I know the statistics say it could).
But there's a timely article this month at Christianity Today about sex abuse in the church that cautions against such assumptions. In fact, it suggests that many churches lag behind secular organizations in facing the reality of the problem:
In the last three years, an average of 23 new articles each day have appeared in secular media sources revealing sexual abuse allegations arising in Protestant churches in the United States. Protestant denominations have been tempted to call sexual abuse a "Catholic problem"; this is simply not true. Within the past eight years, verdicts, judgments, or settlements exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars have been levied against Protestant churches for sexual abuse allegations arising from children participating in ministry programs.
The church and its children are increasingly endangered by sexual predators whose opportunity to ensnare children elsewhere is growing smaller, while the church opens its doors to anyone. Sexual abusers looking for access to children will gravitate to activities and organizations where there are fewer protective measures in place. Secular organizations have responded to this inevitable truth by implementing policies and training to reduce risk. Many churches, however, have done little, because ministries fail to recognize the risks or are laboring under the misconception "it won't happen here."
The article goes on to dispel common myths about sexual abuse in the church (think your church is safe and legally covered because you do criminal background checks, or because you downloaded a generic abuse policy from the internet? Think again...). And it concludes with some good suggestions for intelligently approaching the possibility of sexual abuse in your church.
Not a pleasant topic to think about. But if your church isn't thinking about it, well, with the issue in the news again, "right now" is a good time to get on it.





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (10)
Things like bathrooms are kids only and if there is an adult in there, they are to tell us so we can address it.
Is it a perfect system, nope. But it is better than what we had before. In fact the church does a seminar to teach other churches what they had learned. And the reason why all this was started 5 years ago... a male staff member at the Christian School was abusing young boys. We have probably gone overboard, but it is better than going through all that over again.
About sexual abuse being a Catholic problem--the abuse itself isn't; I'm sure every denomination has its share of paedophiles. I would suggest, though, that the Catholic church has shown more of a tendency to cover these kinds of things up. Catholocism has a long history of using its privileged position to commit and cover up horrible crimes against members and non-members--sorry, but it's true. Anybody who thinks of this as bigotry should go to wikipedia and read a little about the Inquisition, the Gunpowder Plot, the history of the church in the Netherlands--10% of the population was slaughtered in the name of Catholocism by Philip II of Spain. Any organization with those kinds of skeletons in its closet is not going to hesitate to protect its reputation by covering up cases of child abuse in its clergy.
I heard this story from the lips of an ex-priest: The reason he became an ex-priest was that he fell in love with a woman in his parish; he asked to marry her, and she agreed, so he went to the Bishop and asked what he should do. At the same time, another priest was found to have molested one of the boys in the parish. The child molester was bought a house and given a large sum of money to just go away. My friend's "fiancee" decided she didn't want to marry him after all, but the Bishop decided that my friend could not be a priest any longer and took away his office. He was therefore left high and dry while someone who should have been turned over to the police was comfortably provided for as long as he would just not cause any problems for the church. It's this kind of mindset that allowed the problems with sexual abuse to flourish as they did.
Yeah, I know, this is not PC at all, and it will probably tick off the many good Catholics who can hold up examples of good works done in the name of the church. I'm not saying that everything the church does is bad, or even that all Catholics are unsaved. What I am saying is that the way the church dealt with known child abusers indicates that a long history of contempt for the rights of the individual lives on in the Catholic church.
I submit to you that sin (sexual or otherwise) knows no ecclesiastical boundaries and this kind of spiritual oneupmanship turns away unbelievers from the church. It's also why believers like myself have become disillusioned with what currently passes for Christianity in America. There are plenty of "skeletons" in the closets of Catholic and Protestant churches alike. This is not uniquely or historically a Catholic problem.
And no, I'm not Catholic - just a Christian who feels disconnected from the church in America.
http://www.timesunion.com/loca...