Singing the praises of science fiction

Earlier this summer, NPR asked listeners to select the top 100 science fiction and fantasy novels of all time.

By some chance, the final list began and ended with the two most acclaimed Christian novelists of the twentieth century. J.R.R. Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy came in at No. 1, while C.S. Lewis' Space Trilogy rounded out the list at No. 100. (Children's and young adult novels, such as "The Chronicles of Narnia," weren't eligible.)

There are other Christian writers on the list, perhaps most notably Walter M. Miller, Gene Wolfe (both adult converts to Catholicism) and 2009 Science Fiction Hall of Fame inductee Connie Willis, who is said to sing soprano in her church's choir. These writers, however, are the exception rather than the rule.

Right behind "The Lord of the Rings," at No. 2, is the comedic "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by the late Douglas Adams, an avowed atheist (Richard Dawkins' "The God Delusion" was dedicated to Adams). Other atheists on the list include Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke and Kurt Vonnegut, who once served as president of the American Humanist Association. Science-fiction pioneer H. G. Wells, whose novels "The Time Machine" and "The War of the Worlds" both made the list, earned a full chapter in G. K. Chesterton's "Heretics" for his pseduo-scientific Utopianism.

Other writers, meanwhile, embrace decidedly nontraditional beliefs. Ursula K. LeGuin has been a lifelong devotee of Taoism, even writing a translation of the Tao Te Ching. Perhaps furthest outside the mainstream, Alan Moore, whose graphic novel "Watchmen" was made into a 2009 movie, practices ceremonial magic and worships the serpent Glycon, who even Moore regards as fictional.

Considering how few of these writers share our core convictions, should Christians read science fiction and fantasy? I believe so.

First, these genres help us explore our God-given role as "sub-creators." In his essay "On Fairy-Stories," Tolkien defended fantasy because it enables us to honor and imitate God by exercising our creative vocation, using the raw materials created by God.

The creation of new worlds is a major appeal of science fiction and fantasy. Indeed, the top 10 novels in the NPR list actually comprise at least 23 books, because so many are multi-novel series. If sequels are included, the "top 10"  represent more than 50 books altogether.

Second, they can help us see the real world in a fresh way. G. K. Chesterton defended fairy tales in his chapter "The Ethics of Elfland" in "Orthodoxy." Far from distracting us from the world, they rekindle the excitement of discovering the world when we were children: "[These tales] make rivers run with wine only to make us remember, for one wild moment, that they run with water."

Lastly, they create opportunities for theological reflection. It's one thing to debate issues in the abstract and another thing altogether to see them fleshed out in concrete terms. On the other hand, some issues may even be more clearly seen when removed from a realistic context, just as mathematicians use abstractions to solve problems more easily.

If you've never read science fiction or fantasy before, where should you start?

For fantasy, start with Tolkien's "The Hobbit" and continue on to "The Lord of the Rings." Virtually all subsequent fantasy either follows Tolkien's lead or consciously rejects it.

For science fiction, I recommend three accessible classics for starters. All three would generate great book club discussions:

C. S. Lewis, "Out of the Silent Planet": Before creating Narnia, Lewis explored questions of theology through the adventures of planet-hopping professor Elwin Ransom. In this, the first of Lewis' Space Trilogy, Ransom visits Mars and discovers that the Fall of Man had cosmic repercussions.

Isaac Asimov, "The Caves of Steel": This is an old-fashioned detective novel, except that one of the detectives happens to be a super-intelligent robot. As the story progresses, the main characters wrestle with what it means to be human and the nature of evil.

Ursula K. LeGuin, "The Left Hand of Darkness": LeGuin, like many so-called "soft" sci-fi writers, uses science fiction primarily as a setting to explore character and philosophical themes, rather than focusing on technical details of science. In this novel, an envoy from Earth is seeking to open diplomatic relations with a planet whose inhabitants are just like human beings, except they have only one gender, which can be either male or female. What would human society look like if there was no concept of gender?

What Do You Think?

  • Beyond these books, what would be your suggestions?
  • What can Christians draw from them?

 

 

Leave a comment

A login account is required to leave a comment

Comments (24)

As a young Christian I was deeply impacted by the stories of Zenna Henderson.  As a young school teacher she volunteered to teach in a Japanese-American internment camp during WW2.  Her stories indited racism well before that was an acceptable motif, using the vehicle of refugees from an unfallen planet trying to blend in here on earth...
I know this wasn't the main point of your post, but I just wanted to point out that Taoism has been practiced for centuries, and is certainly not "nontraditional".
In my early teens I was not yet a Christian and I was fascinated by science fiction. I read every single science fiction book in that category in the public library, from the Martian Chronicles to Fahrenheit 451 to Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy to all the wonderful Philip K. Dick stories. The books that stuck with me after becoming a Christian were the Lord of the Rings trilogy, CS Lewis Out of the Silent planet trilogy and a few others. CS Lewis wrote one of the most perceptive, prophetic books I’ve ever read in the last volume of his trilogy, That Hideous Strength. He catalogued the rise of elite academic liberalism, a sanitized Stalinism masquerading as enlightened, compassionate socialism. I re-read it last year and was shocked with how accurate his predictions were and I would highly recommend reading it today. He nails the liberal, politically correct dystopia that is England today.
Loved the same list, adding A Canticle for Liebowitz, Pierre Boulle's Planet of the Apes, and On the Beach; Lewis's trilogy in particular---as a teenager,I read Out of the Silent Planet in my public h.s. senior lit class, my first exposure to Lewis' fiction.  As for dystopias, I'd think 1984 and Brave New World to be much more chilling and prophetic; I'll duck though, when any Brits respond to your last sentence! :?)
I also notice how many of the titles on the list are "classics" from the post-WWII/Cold War era; does today's culture provide comparatively as much pervasive inspiration for the genre? or is sci-fi/fantasy an just an established niche?
Do you mean my list or the NPR list (http://www.npr.org/2011/08/09/... I think part of the dominance of older novels is simply influence over a greater period of time (e.g. who *hasn't* read 1984 or Brave New World?). On the full NPR list, the top 10 includes 2 novels of the 1980s (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Ender's Game) and 2 of the '90s-2000's (American Gods, A Song of Fire and Ice). As part of my research, I actually made a list of the authors appearing most often on NPR's list. Several were pre/post-WWII, like Heinlein, Asimov, Clarke, but some contemporary writers also appeared several times. Neil Gaiman tied Heinlein with the most listings (4), and Neal Stephenson had 3 (the same as Asimov/Clarke). 

Rather than sci-fi/fantasy being an established genre, I think the rapid growth of the genre has made it harder for new writers to gain the same level of general popularity as the older writers, because of the sheer number of sub-genres and new writers.
Robert Jordan envisioned the entire Wheel of Time concept as a means of showing why we can be glad for the western concept of linear (instead of cyclic) time.

He also once commented that the first few chapters of "The Eye of the World" were his tribute to Tolkein, and then the rest of the book runs away from Tolkein as quickly as possible.
Brian (and Dori), I'll have to give the Wheel of Time a second chance after your comments. I read the first 5 or 6 books with great enthusiasm, but gave up on the series because I felt like it wasn't going anywhere.
I did too, although I think I made it through 7 or 8 before giving up.  However, I've read the last few that came out (12 and 13?) and finding more happening again.  I think he just got bogged down in the middle.
I find the sacrificial hero (giving his life to save the world) is prominent in my two favorite series, The Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan, and The Harry Potter Series, by J.K. Rowling.
If you're a Christian and want an easy start into the excellent books of Gene Wolfe, I love "Pirate Freedom!". All of his books are amazing, though. 

I just read "A Canticle for Liebowitz" which is also an excellent novel about the preserving influence of the Catholic church in the midst of a world falling to pieces. It was really beautiful.
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll have to read that one. I loved Wolfe's Book of the New Sun, but it is not for the sci-fi novice.
Thanks, Anny. You're absolutely right, and I tried to think of a different word than "nontraditional." I only meant that Taoism isn't part of the usual American religious spectrum. "Non-Western" or "non-Judeo-Christian" would probably have been better.
Thanks, Kevin. I had not heard of her before now, but I will add her books to my "to read" file.

One of my favorite sci-fi writers when I was young was Cordwainer Smith, and I was delighted as a young Christian to return to them and find Christian symbolism interwoven into them.
This piece is a breath of fresh air. I argued similarly about sci-fi and fantasy in connection with the sub-creators idea in my chapter contribution to Halos & Avatars, edited by Craig Detweiler.

I would sing the praises of not only science fiction, but also fantasy, and even horror, as a Christian scholar. I write for Cinefantastique Online, and my own blog TheoFantastique.com, where I bring out the religious and cultural significance of these fantastic genres, and hope that more Christians can consider the same. These genres are especially good at serving as vehicles for the consideration of cultural and religious issues, and can also bring together people of diverse religious and irreligious backgrounds for conversation about such things.

Glad to find this site and this essay.
The list didn't specify, but probably assumed, adult-reading-level; missing are the many novels of Madeleine L'Engle and a host of children's lit/young-adult lit authors.
Yes, the list (mine and NPRs's) were for adult-level novels. Next summer, NPR is planning on a similar poll for children's and young adult sci-fi and fantasy.
I rather take exception to categorizing some novels as kiddie lit/adult lit. I derived decidedly different satisfactions from reading Lewis or L'Engle now than I did when I read them as a 11-year-old. Indeed Aslan grows bigger each time I encounter him.
Yes, the best "children's lit" can be enjoyed for a lifetime. I do think, though, that it can be helpful to identify appropriate reading levels. I've had some bad experiences when trying to introduce my children to books that were intended for older readers. As for myself, I didn't read much children's or young adult lit when I was younger and have tried to make up for it as an adult. While some books have become new-found favorites, there are others for which I "missed the window" when they would have been engaging for me.

Leave a Comment »

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now