Some Thoughts on Commenting

I’ve been thinking a lot about commenting lately. As the one who ends up moderating most of the comments, I’m always wondering how the TC conversation will go based on comments that are approved. In general, the policy has always been to be light handed in moderating to allow the conversation to naturally flow. Very few comments submitted are bumped or edited.

Because of this policy, I feel like the conversations happening on Think Christian are becoming more confrontational and off topic. Obviously, that’s a direction we don’t want to go. I realize some of the contributors are to blame for this as well. That’s why I’ve asked them the same thing I’m asking you to do. Just take a couple of minutes to review the commenting guidelines for TC (linked here and here.)  Honestly, I have the discussion guidelines on the wall next to my computer monitor and I haven't looked at them lately either.  So this will be good for me too.

Some highlights include that good comments are:

  • specifically relevant to the issues or questions raised by the original post
  • reasonably short and concise
  • friendly and polite in tone and language (even if you're commenting on something with which you strongly disagree)
  • contributes something positive and new to the topic

So use whichever time-out metaphor you want. Maybe it’s a coach frantically putting his hands together to try and stop the clock in the last few seconds of a football game. Or maybe it’s a kid standing in the corner. Whatever it is, let’s take a little break. We all want this to be a place where we can share our thoughts without feeling like we’re being attacked or criticized. We also want to be able to carry on a conversation without feeling like things are taking a weird, off topic turn.  As we take time to look over the guidelines, all of us at TC are committing to be better moderators, who unapologetically make sure this blog is a place of good Christian conversation and not a place for diatribes.

To show our commitment to quality comments, we’re going to start highlighting some of the best comments from TC-er’s each month. Starting next month, we’ll pick a handful of the top comments and ask for your favorites too. There will more details to come about this, but I’m sure there could be some lovely TC prizes involved.

As I’ve said before, I truly value the TC community and I’m always impressed at how it often moderates itself. Thanks for talking a minute to read this and thanks for being a part of Think Christian.

Login to comment

Comments (9)

Thank you! I, too, have noticed a lot more angst coming through cyberspace lately. We could talk all day and all night about why that is, but it doesn't matter unless we're willing to take responsibility for ourselves first.

I'm certainly not yet a master at this, but I'm motivated to practice "speaking the truth in love" (Eph. 4:15).
I suggested once before, I think Jerod responded to it, that when a sub-topic develops, the moderator should simply move it to a separate post, with a link saying "Many people responding to this topic went off on a tangent debating about ##############. This discussion has been moved to <link>. Its not a bad thing, but it can be distracting.
For now, I think the goal is to stay on topic. We're not really set up to have a good place to move a conversation. It could always be a feature we add in the future as we consider upgrades to the site.
I would like to comment on commenting. Thank you for bringing up this topic. Commenting is fun.

So...how did i do? :)

David
www.redletterbelievers.com
i'm quite new to this blogging. but as i've surfed other blogs, thinkchristian stands out as being very balanced and intelligent and interesting. and not just the posts but also the commenters. it really helped me evaluate my views on things. i think the key is respect and to keep an open mind always. to try and see where the other person is coming from.
i'd also like to apologize to those whom i've offended with my word.

may we all continue to grow in grace and knowledge of God through this site.

alvin
I am not surprised that the Bruno blog elicited such passionate responses. Sascha Cohen’s goal was to offend and shock as many people of traditional Christian morals as possible. And as evidenced by the blog responses, he succeeded. The title of the blog was “Bruno and the limits of Christian compassion”. What Josh does not reveal is how those limits were tested. That’s why I felt obligated to fill in the blanks. The nature of the scenes portrayed were so graphically offensive that, unlike our intrepid film reviewer, some secular reviewers refused to submit themselves to the sleaze-fest.

It’s also hard not to respond when a blog author offers that homosexuality may not be sin and that Jesus and the disciples modeled healthy homosexuality as did Ruth and Naomi or David and Jonathan. That is a provocative comment that most Christians would be offended by. Try testing out that concept on your home church. This is a topic that is guaranteed to generate heat especially when you must either agree with the assertion that homosexuality is not sinful or face being labeled a homophobe.

It’s also difficult when the blogger poses a false choice, asking which is more important, moral certitude or compassion. God is righteous and God is love, you don’t get to choose between these two qualities. I tried to take the middle ground, but I admit I let my emotions get involved. So I apologize for frequent and heated comments. My bad. Proverbs says that iron sharpens iron and despite the irritation I appreciate the challenges to our belief systems. In the future I will express my opinions with less heat and more love.

Oh, and good comment rupzip.
That observation ties the general topic of commenting in to the specific of one of the last set of comments. rick makes a good case for why the moderators should not be too quick to pounce on diatribe. Filtering out personal attacks, cursing, etc. is quite in order. But, as the person who raised the question, what exactly was the love between David and Jonathan, I am not offended by the fact that rick might have some strongly worded objections. That's part of the dialog. As long as we are talking, not hitting each other over the head, or burning each other at the stake, it is good to challenge each other. At the end of the day, we find we have a good deal to agree on -- I too was offended by Cohen's gratuitous obscenity. I recall past discussions where people I never agreed with said "This time I'm going to agree..." I have followed links from this site to the site of people I passionately disagreed with, to find other topics we could have amicable discussions about.
I would just like to suggest, again, that when a moderator exercises their discretion not to post a comment, a brief email would be in order, stating why. First, it would help people learn what is, and is not, expected on the site, for those who sincerely want to comply. Second, if the moderator didn't get around to checking the incoming for three days, we would all know, its still under consideration, I didn't get an email yet. Use a no-reply source, so you don't have to worry about being bombarded with argumentative replies to your replies.
Blessed are the peacemakers/keepers?

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now