Stuck on a plane: where’s the leadership and compassion?

A blog post this morning from Phil Cooke, got me thinking a little more about something that happened over the weekend. You may have heard about the Continental Express flight where passengers were stuck in a plane overnight for nine hours.  Much of that time was sitting on the tarmac 50 yards away from a gate. Some of the 47 passengers reported the toilets were backed up, there was no food or drink and there was really no room to stand up in the small commuter jet.

Clearly people were miserable, yet no one made the call to go ahead and bring the plane to the terminal or to get a bus to take the passengers the 86 miles to their final destination. Sure, there are rules that grounded the plane because of weather. And there are rules about what crew members can and can’t do once the plane is on the ground. But Cooke asks, where’s the leadership?

The question that's driving me crazy is, wasn't there a single person in the cockpit or in the airport that would make the decision to let these poor people off the plane? Have we come to a place where people just slavishly obey the rules no matter what?

For me, the bigger question is, where’s the compassion? It’s obvious the crew on that plane could see that people were suffering, yet no one made a move. I’m sure officials on the ground at the airport knew what was happening too, but no one took the time to take these people out of their misery.

Of course there is a lot of blame going around right now and folks are once again calling for a passenger’s bill of rights. But isn’t the real solution common decency in interacting with the people around us? Is it so hard to mesh Cooke’s call for leadership and the Bible’s demand for compassion?

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (4)

The safer we are, the more fearful we become and the more laws and regulations we pass. This reminds me of California's mandatory sentencing laws or the 3 strikes and you are out laws. Although the guidelines were well intentioned when passed, instead of creating less crime it's filled the prisons to bursting, increased the recidivism rate dramatically, taken wise discretion out of the hands of the judges and puts it in the hands of the state. It also reminds me of the excesses of school zero tolerance drug and weapon laws where kids are automatically expelled for having a tylenol or carrying a plastic knife in their lunch boxes. It takes responsibility and discretion out of the hands of the principals and puts it in the hands of the state leaving no room for common sense. These are called Nanny Laws.

Here's what Jesus had to say about slavish unthinking compliance with laws. "Have you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry and in need? In the days of Abiathar the high priest, he entered the house of God and ate the consecrated bread, which is lawful only for priests to eat. And he also gave some to his companions. The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."

"He said to them, "If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? How much more valuable is a man than a sheep!"


Your absolutely correct. We don't need any "passenger bill of rights" if we behave with common sense, compassion, and initiative. People need to wake up and stop being sheep led astray by the powers that be that have no interest in a person's welfare. It was not like this. Now due to the masses' apathy, the powers are out of control. Ultimately God is in control and we as the masses can reclaim that Divine control over our lives and stand up to man made control that is created from selfishness and disconnect with God and selves.
that is ridiculous. and yes, i believe that people would rather slavishly follow rules than do any real thinking on their own. mostly because so many laws are in place that will probably get them in more trouble should they desire to do any thinking.
This is the nature of any large bureaucracy, whether in the public or private sector. If there is no rule or procedure authorizing someone to act, then most people will refrain for fear of being told they shouldn't have. Also, if there is not a person explicitly charged to relay the information to someone who could make a decision, nobody will make a decision. We do need, in many areas, to restore a sense of discretion, and that reasonable exercise of that discretion will NOT be penalized. Of course discretion WILL be abused, anything good will be. That was how we got into this mess of making everything mandatory.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now