From an individual perspective, it is hard to distinguish between the times when excessive optimism is good and the times when it isn't. All that we can say unequivocally is that overconfidence is, as Wrangham puts it, "globally maladaptive." When one opponent bluffs, he can score an easy victory. But when everyone bluffs, Wrangham writes, rivals end up "escalating conflicts that only one can win and suffering higher costs than they should if assessment were accurate."That got me thinking about faith and overconfidence. And about Paul's ambivalence about "confidence in the flesh" in Philippians 3, where he says God "put no confidence in the flesh, though I myself have reasons for such confidence." Is overconfidence simply a danger for faith? Or is overconfidence the essence of faith?
A few hasty conclusions:
- Because of the curse of sin in the world, we know and can even expect that mighty financial systems and other empires will collapse under their own greed (or "bluffing," to use Gladwell's term). So faith rightly leads us to "put no confidence in the flesh."
- Because of the curse of sin in the world, we can't generally adopt a blithe, chipper optimism about the future. We know that death, disappointment, and despair are inevitabilities. In a way, we are called to have underconfidence about life in a broken world. This is a wise alternative to the fatuous can-do overconfidence we're sold by commercials, candidates, Wall Street, and even health-and-wealth pastors. Reinhold Niebuhr called this Christian Realism
- Prayer, nonetheless, often requires overconfidence. "Ask and it will be given to you"; "Say to this mountain, 'move from here to there'"—this is not a call to rational assessment.
- God's intervention in the world and in our lives is extraordinary, unexpected, and unpredictable, giving cause for occasional overconfidence. Ten years ago, having confidence in the prospects of peace in Northern Ireland would have been a bad bet. But it happened. To me, peace in the Middle East right now seems nearly impossible. Maybe it will be for generations to come. But maybe not.
- Spiritual formation often requires overconfidence. I once listened to a Tim Keller sermon in which he quoted an illustration, I forget from whom, that when you see an acorn under a stone, you predict the stone will win that showdown. Long term, however, the outcome is counterintuitive but certain: a mighty oak will toss the stone aside. Keller said the same is true of sanctification—it looks like it will be a blowout (sin over goodness), but in the end it turns out to be a blowout the other way.





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (10)
Paul was probably the most capable, well educated, trans-cultural scholar and theologian of the early church, yet when called to share the gospel of the Kingdom with the Corinthians Paul said “I came to you in weakness and fear, and with much trembling. My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit's power, so that your faith might not rest on men's wisdom, but on God's power.” Paul presented the gospel to the Romans by by “the power of signs and miracles, through the power of the Spirit”. Luke says that “God did extraordinary miracles through Paul, so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them.” This lack of confidence in his own abilities was not because he was deficient in ability. It was because he was introducing them to a real, living God. He was not promoting new ethics, principals, philosophy, religous practices, de-constructive analyses, Bible study techniques or theology. He was not winning coverts due to his powerful preaching or grasp of hermaneutics. He was introducing them to a powerful, living and active Holy Spirit. The most convincing arguement Paul could make was to allow God to demonstrate His miraculous power through him. It is not possible to be over confident in God’s power or goodness.
It reminded me of a story my father used to tell about a professional conman he knew. This conman said that the best marks, the ones who were easiest to fool, were 1) doctors and 2) airplane pilots. Why? Because they thought they knew everything. They were therefore very easy to snow; they didn't want it to look like they didn't understand the cock and bull story the conman was telling them, and so they pretended that they knew it all already.
Faith has nothing to do with overconfidence, though, because faith is always based on the word of God. God is definitely not telling us to be overconfident, to think that we can move mountains or save the world in our own strength. He is telling us to believe in the promises in his word; if there is no promise it is not belief, but presumption.
Ultimately, anything (e.g. Market Capitalism) contrary to God's objectives will be subdued and renewed or replaced.
Jesus was a small businessman for 30 of His 33 years. His father’s carpenter shop was one of hundreds of privately own carpenter shops in Israel turning out chairs, doors and wooden goods for profit. No wonder so many of his proverbs were illustrated with allusions to investing in other businesses, ROI (return on investing) and earning interest at the bank. Peter and John owned several ships and supplied the Israel market with fish. Even in the first year of the church when early converts experimented with communalism, Peter made very clear personal property rights, the right to retain the profits from a sale etc. A large bit of Old testament law concerns itself with personal property rights. The excesses of capitalism are only exceeded by the excesses of communism, socialism, fascism, and other top down command economies. Our problem is selfishness, not capitalism. Overconfidence in any economic system to solve the moral problems of the world is misplaced. I would agree with you on that point.
I too like to quote the passage from the last chapter of Proverbs about the wife "more precious than rubies." Many of those who have wrapped themselves in Biblical morality to urge that women should be submissive, staying at home, etc. have cited this passage, and they obviously haven't read it. Yes, she does have independent discretion to spend family finances, she does make decisions about buying and selling real estate without her husband's permission. It seems her husband has nothing to do but sit in the gate with the elders, accepting praise for what a good provider his wife is. There are parallels in ancient Assyria, where women ran businesses of their own, and in feudal Japan, where women took care of money, because samurai shouldn't be bothered with such sordid details. But by no stretch does Proverbs tell us there is a market CAPITALIST economy at work in ancient Israel. This is a small producer economy, not a stock market building giant combines that draw wage labor employees from all over the eastern Mediterranean. I bet most of her family are the workers in the vineyard, and the rest are slaves or seven year indentured servants.
Market Capitalism says "Markets Rule" and maintains that they are self regulatory. Thus the buyer and seller determine the flow of goods and orphans fall out of the equation. Of course it's OK to have goods, to pay for them and not steal. The question is not: can I buy and sell, but how I buy and sell? Market Capitalism says: "if the price is right, do it".
Or Antiquity and Capitalism By John R. Love or The Jews and Modern Capitalism By Werner Sombart, Samuel Z. Klausner. The literature is abundant.
But much as I think capitalism has made a positive contribution and raised the standard of living for any nation that has adopted it, I would not want to be overconfident in it’s abilities. In fact it appears that a perverted form of capitalism has a role in the destruction of the end times as seen in the book of Revelations. And isn’t it like the devil to hijack any good thing. But I don’t think this is the place to debate the merits of economic systems, I will stick to the topic of over-confidence. I didn’t introduce the topic of capitalism into this blog and I won’t comment on it any more.
How could one say that market capitalism exemplifies over-confidence on the part of believers? Consider this juxtaposition assembled by Ambrose Bierce. Wealth is:
"A sign from God, saying this is my beloved son, in whom I am will pleased." --John D. Rockefeller
"The savings of many, in the hands of one."
--Eugene V. Debs