‘War Horse’ and returning soldiers

I have my problems with Steven Spielberg's "War Horse" (the first third in particular, which has way too much inspirational plowing). Yet in its consideration of the brutalities of war and the scars left on home-bound soldiers, the movie is of vital, timely importance - for the United States as a whole and Gospel-following Christians in particular.

The story is told mostly through the eyes of Joey, a horse that is drafted into the English cavalry in World War I and spends that conflict passing through the hands of various owners, eventually ending up in the hellish trenches of France. In the way it views humanity's folly through the eyes of an animal, "War Horse" recounts one of the great films of all time: "Au Hasard Balthazar." Yet it's also very much of today. Released in the same month that the last American soldiers left Iraq, "War Horse" is about the life-defining experience of leaving young innocence behind to engage in senseless violence, to survive out of sheer luck and then come home again - alive, but deeply changed.

We usually don't like to talk about such experiences. Indeed, when Think Christian ran an article last month by a former armed forces chaplain about the ways churches should receive returning soldiers, the story had far-below-average page views and not a single comment. This, along with America's history of ignoring (if not villifying) returning soldiers, left me dispirited. Jesus welcomed the weary and burdened; shouldn't we count returning soldiers among them?

Perhaps a major movie being sniffed by Oscar will help to force this conversation. Which brings me back to what I do appreciate about "War Horse." The picture is at its most artful in its darkest moments: a military execution, partly obscured by the mercifully sweeping arm of a windmill; a cavalry of horses jerking their heads up in unison at the sound of a single, lethal shot; a climactic reunion in silhouette, in which the ostentatiously red sunset isn't there to warm our hearts, but to remind us that this has been a tale of both balm and blood.

In other words, "War Horse" is honest, not sentimental, about the cost of armed conflict. As honest, in fact, as was another veteran of World War I's trenches, C.S. Lewis. In a letter, Lewis wrote this about his war experience:

My memories of the last war haunted my dreams for years. Military service, to be plain, includes the threat of every temporal evil; pain and death, which is what we fear from sickness; isolation from those we love, which is what we fear from exile; toil under arbitrary masters, which is what we fear from slavery: hunger, thirst, and exposure which is what we fear from poverty. I'm not a pacifist. If it's got to be it's got to be. But the flesh is weak and selfish, and I think death would be much better than to live through another war.

Even worse? Living through one, coming home and not having your weariness and burdens shared by Christians who care.

(Image courtesy of DreamWorks.)

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (4)

Josh I think you have hit upon an important problem, a lot of Christians don't seem to care. They say they care but I think it boils down to fear and commitment.

Is our view of Christianity and our role as Christians in this world project based or relationship based when it comes to fellowship with others? It is fairly easy to join a group that raises money to aid an anonymous group elsewhere. When asked to reach out to an individual in pain and offer help even when that request is a nudge from within our own hearts, that is harder because it could mean the start of a long term commitment to befriending someone who might take time away from our top priorities.

People like returning soldiers with mental stress injuries and people in our society who suffer from illness and loss often get brushed off because average folks don't know what to say. There is that "Someone else will help them" attitude that pervades society. Too often that "someone else" never comes along. BUT when someone does take the time to say "Hey come have a coffee with me," or "Let me read that editorial you are writing for the Sun," whatever it is that shows you are paying attention, it means everything and truly shows Jesus love.
I was disappointed by the movie (too Disneyfied), but your post adds a new layer of meaning to it for me. Thanks for your thoughtful and well-written admonition. In our era of professional military, we we no longer have the same connection with the troops as in the past. In the the first two world wars, enlisting, serving, and helping with the war effort was much more personal, communal, and universal. Everyone knew someone who was in the war or had a family member in the war. I live in a military-intensive city and yet I don't know anyone who is, or has been, serving overseas in the military, either in my circles or in my church (if they are there, they are in their civvies). And that's why your post is important. To see our returning military, we have to make an effort to look. They are there, and it is our Christian responsibility to see them, just as Jesus looked on the masses and saw their needs.
I agree with you Josh. America’s history of ignoring (if not villifying) returning soldiers, leaves me dispirited as well. I am looking forward to seeing this film. However, I don’t believe that was the motivation for ignoring the earlier blog by the retired chaplin. I have no desire to fight the iraq war over again so I didn’t comment. Some Christians here are of the Yoder, pacifist variety who believe we should always love our enemy. They regard iraq as Bush's war. They can only view a returning soldier as someone who has compromised their moral values. That does a grave disservice to soldiers and leaves them once again ambiguous about their service, just as pacifists during the Viet Nam war denigrated the returning vets. Herman calls Iraq “a war that is very morally ambiguous.“ How is a vet supposed to feel when Herman says “For most soldiers who carry the moral wounds of war, absolution is an intensely private matter, because we have devalued public confession and pronouncement of forgiveness.” There is a presumtion of guilt, moral failure for following duty and defending country. Is it any wonder no one commented on that story? My nephew and my best friend’s son both served in Iraq and Afghanistan and we support them every way we can. Our church has a weekly fellowship for returned vets. Life is tragedy and human beings were not created to kill each other in a fallen world. But aid to the defenseless, self sacrifice and duty to country are noble virtues. I think I will resonate with the sentiments of War Horse. Thanks for the review.
I would add that on the coat-tails of War Horse comes Downton Abbey,with the immense pain, waste,and brokenness of World War I as the second season's context.
Thanks for the extra layer of interp and the reminder to care for those who have borne the battle as well as for their widows and children.

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now