What Johnny Depp doesn’t get about Hunter S. Thompson

"The Rum Diary" represents Johnny Depp's second attempt to bring the creative spirit of Hunter S. Thompson to the big screen, and it's also the second instance where he's failed. What’s interesting is that this time he’s managed to get the infamous gonzo journalist wrong in a completely different way.

Depp's first foray was 1998's "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas," a trippy, bedraggled mess of a movie that portrayed Thompson as an inebriated clown. There was little sense of why the man's work mattered.

"The Rum Diary" is far more respectful, likely because it's been produced since Thompson's 2005 death. Indeed, Depp's performance here - once again playing a fictionalized version of Thompson - is something of a eulogy. Respectful, elegiac, sugar-coated - exactly the sort of things Thompson hated.

One of the author's early novels (thought belatedly published), "The Rum Diary" is a thinly veiled fictional take on his adventures as a journalist-for-hire in 1950s Puerto Rico, when expatriate developers were in a race to import the American Dream (Thompson's favorite target) on the backs of the exploited islanders. The novel captures Thompson's disgust at all this, but the movie goes a step further, portraying him as some sort of social crusader - Che Guevara with a pen.

What "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and "The Rum Diary" both miss is Thompson's most distinctive element: his prophetic disillusionment. Reading Thompson, I'm often reminded of the Old Testament prophets who called out the hypocritical ways of God's people. There’s been talk lately about Steve Jobs being something of a secular prophet, but Thompson is actually a better example.

In "The Rum Diary," for example, Thompson offers this description of a newspaper editor who publishes sunny lies for willfully blind readers:

"He was just another noisy little punk in the great legion of punks who marched between the banners of bigger and better men. Freedom, Truth, Honor - you could rattle off a hundred such words and behind every one of them would gather a thousand punks, pompous little farts, waving the banner with one hand and reaching under the table with the other."

The passage has the sting of condemnation, the distaste for deceitfulness, that you also find in the words of Micah.

An interesting characteristic about so many of the Old Testament prophets is that they were often uneasy about their place in God's story. "I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips," Isaiah protested, emphasizing his fallen state, his humanity, in the face of God's glory. Thompson had a similar awareness of his own fallibility. Though he despised the hypocrisy surrounding him - the sales pitch that America was a paradise without problems - he also acknowledged that he had partly bought into it, and was therefore a hypocrite as well.

Consider this Thompson prose, also from "The Rum Diary:"

"I shared a vagrant optimism that some of us were making real progress, that we had taken an honest road, and that the best of us would inevitably make it over the top. At the same time, I shared a dark suspicion that the life we were leading was a lost cause, that we were all actors, kidding ourselves along on a senseless odyssey. It was the tension between these two poles — a restless idealism on one hand and a sense of impending doom on the other — that kept me going."

"The Rum Diary" at least nods to this with a subplot in which the Thompson character half-heartedly agrees to take a PR job for a sleazy developer. But it's a brief allusion, when the movie's primary goal is to lionize him, as evidenced by a final piece of onscreen text that suggests the real Thompson went on to save America.

Such a noble, rosy depiction guts what's always been most interesting about Thompson: that this decidedly "heathen" writer was so deeply aware of our total depravity. He saw our need for redemption - collectively and personally - as incisively as any theologian. Indeed, he saw it as clearly as a prophet.

(Photo courtesy of Fox Searchlight Pictures.)

Login to comment

IMPORTANT Did you have an account on the old ThinkChristian.net site? Click here transition your account. This will sync all your comments with your email address.

Comments (7)

Hunter writing (in response to Johnny Depp's phone call) on Sept 17, 2001, re the events of 9/11 and Pres. Bush's statement that we are at war:  "Generals and military scholars will tell you that eight or ten years is actually not such a long time in the span of human history---which is no doubt true---but history also tells us that 10 years of martial law and a war-time economy are going to feel like a lifetime to people who are in their twenties today.  The poor bastards of what will forever be known as Generation Z are doomed to be the first generation of Americans who will grow up wih a lower standard of living than their parents enjoyed . . . . The last half of the 20th century will seem like a wild party for rich kids, compared to what's coming now. The party's over, folks . . . ." ( "When War Drums Roll"  from ESPN.com 09/17/2001)
I used this quote in a graduation speech---my son's high school, where I also taught and coached--- in 2005, several months after Thompson shot himself.  I used H.T. as the example of an accurate, yet despairing, prophet; and I countered with another prophet, a prophet of hope, Dr. M.L.King, Jr., who spoke of the turmoil of society in the 1960's: "I'm happy to live in this period---we've been forced to a point where we are going to have to grapple with the problems that men and women have been trying to grapple with throughout history---but the demands didn't force them to do it, to address poverty, oppression, injustice, hurt and neglect worldwide. . . ." 
I can hear both voices, Thompson's despair and King's hope, echoed in Jeremiah and Isaiah . . . .
Is there such a thing as a "secular" prophet? Isn't this the same thing as "Christian" music and "Christian" books. When did beauty and truth get regulated to where it was sold?
Thanks for your comment, Bryan. I’m not sure what you mean by the “Christian” books and music analogy. Perhaps you can explain that further.

As for the idea of a “secular prophet,” I’d define that as a prominent cultural figure who may not claim to be speaking for God, yet nonetheless speaks God’s truth. In Hunter S. Thompson’s case, I feel his ranting against the hypocrisy and inequality inherent in the “American dream” (which boils down to individual prosperity at the cost of community) is very much in line with Biblical teaching.
I guess I don't disagree, but it seems like everything has become "Christian" (many times meaning "good") or... not. And, somehow, it seems that "Christian" stuff has become much more accepted, regardless of it's content, etc. So, for me - and I do realize I might be taking your point completely wrong - I get annoyed whenever I have friends who say, "Well, he would be making a good point if he was speaking Biblically..." ARGH. My point, then, becomes: isn't he just a prophet? Can God use people who are not necessarily operating (in their own mind, at least) from a Biblically-centered p.o.v.? I just hate having to fight the culture war every time I suggest a book or movie or piece of music that doesn't happen to be in Lifeway.

I may be ranting at this point.

And did I say: I enjoyed what you had to say? No, probably not... but I did.
Thanks Bryan. I think we actually are on the same page. In fact, you could say the main point of this piece was to point out that God can speak through prophets who wouldn't necessarily be approved by the Christian establishment.
I'm realizing this... :) Glad I found the site!
You've convinced me to read Thompson's work now.  Congratulations! :)

See the latest in:

Promotion

promo 1 promo 2
promo 3 promo 4

Donate Now