(Bethany is a guest blogger for Think Christian. Read more about her here.)
I’m a little late on this one, but I can’t stop thinking about it. I was troubled by this editorial published in Slate a few weeks ago. The author, Andrew Santella, uses the Obama family’s church-shopping in DC as a springboard to discuss church shopping culture in general. His description extends beyond the process of finding a new church in a new place (something everyone has to do when they move) and includes a chronic culture of church shopping.
Santella argues that a church shopping culture encourages excellence as a reaction to competition. He writes, “But while it may be frequently derided as an example of rampant spiritual consumerism, shopping around can be one of the good things about the way religion is practiced in America.” In some ways, he anticipates my argument here: religion is not a product, we shouldn’t approach it that way.
However, my objection to his perspective is deeper. Santella doesn’t seem to recognize that there is more to belonging to a church than picking the flashiest band or the most inspiring preacher. He writes, “Knowing that churchgoers have so many options should keep pastors and preachers on their toes. In that sense, church shopping transfers a bit of power from the pulpit to the pews. And keeping a check on the power of church leaders is never a bad idea.”
Wait, church shopping transfers power into the pews? In every church I’ve ever belonged to, the real strength of the church resides firmly in the pews all the time. Of course, pastors are an important part of a church, but this is what I think Santella, and chronic church-shoppers don’t get: church is about community. If you never dig in and commit to a particular church community, you miss most of it.
Sure, ministers, sermons and worship are important parts of the life of a church, but all of that is empty if it isn’t the work of a real body of believers that supports each other and holds each other accountable. Indeed, those regular pew-sitters usually outlast any particular leader, and truly set the tone of the church. And here’s the thing about church shopping: if you don’t pick a place and invest in it, you are never going to make a difference there.
This, to me, is the real problem with the consumer model of church. Consumers attend churches looking for what they can get out of it, and this is certainly part of what we should think about, but they never ask themselves “what can I put in?” If we keep thinking of church as a product for sale, it keeps us from thinking about Christianity as a way of being. Viewing Christianity instead as a habit, a membership, a mode of life brings back the radical power of God’s work in us.
But it is hard for us to act that way if we keep thinking about our churches as a product that is competing in the market for consumers. The true measure of a church’s success is not the number of bodies in pews on Sunday morning or dollars in the budget—it’s the hands and feet of the congregation holding each other up and doing God’s work in the world.





Login to comment
Alternate Login
Use your social media account to login.
Login with your ReFrame account
Comments (15)
I think you could go even further, however; I'd disagree with Santella in suggesting that church shopping, instead of transferring power from the pulpit to the pews, does exactly the opposite. If the congregation votes with their feet rather than with their commitment, all the pastor has to do is tweak the message a little to put more and different butts in the pews (or, more appropriately for this model, install some movie theatre seats to make those butts a little more comfortable). Add some bells and whistles, maybe a pop culture song or two and a pretty PowerPoint presentation, and all those church shoppers come back to teh nice new show.
However, if the congregation is committed to the church, they're going to put a lot more pressure on the pastor--not to tailor his or her message to the congregation necessarily, but to engage in dialogue with the congregation. They're not going to be a bunch of replaceable names, faces, and Benjamins in the collection plate; they're going to be people the pastor knows are going to stick around regardless, and are going to hold his or her feet to the fire rather than just walking away. Excellent pastors will see this as a challenge and an opportunity, a chance to engage dialogically with the church and raise up lay leadership that will hold him or her to account more effectively.
As much as I'd like to agree with the fact that it's not about me, it is a little. We found a church that had a great young couples ministry and strong biblical teaching, which was good for our spiritual growth. But as importantly, it's a church growing in passion about being missional and reaching out to the community. So we did pick a church partially on what it had for us but we know it had the "what can we put it" component as well.
I also think it sounds like you guys, like many of my friends who are invested in churches, had a realistic assumption that all churches will have things you don't like. When you have that assumption then you can believe that it's your job to love them anyway, and maybe try to make the church better through your involvement.
Also see Mary H's article on why you should go to a church 4 times when shopping: http://tr.im/hqSN
Did anybody read the news lately that the evangelical church, the mainstream protestant denominations in America are in serious decline. The whole choir/pastor/preacher/sunday school/pew paradigm is in trouble. For too long America has been the protectorate of the professional clergy, the person known as the Pastor who preaches the sermons every sunday and wednesday and basically runs the church. It's what I've grown up in. What a terribly flawed idea. It leads to the culture of pew-sitting consumers who shop around looking for the funniest, most inspiring and comfortable professional. It leads to bored, unengaged teenagers. No wonders pastors burn out as well. Does anyone know how many times the word Pastor is used in the New Testament? ONCE in ephesians 4:11. And it doesn’t even mean the “head preacher who runs the church”. Does anyone know how many times the word prophet is used in the New Testament? 157 times.
What is Church to Paul? “What then shall we say, brothers? When you come together, everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church. If anyone speaks in a tongue, two—or at the most three—should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God. Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said. And if a revelation comes to someone who is sitting down, the first speaker should stop. For you can all prophesy in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged. The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets. For God is not a God of disorder but of peace.” 1st corinthians 14:26. Did you see Pastor/Preacher there? Did you see choir there and audience seats? Why are we so afraid of what has been termed “Charismatic”. This is the church expression or structure that has been exploding in Africa, South America and China. This is not the kind of theater that one passively shops for, this is the family one is born into and called into.
One of the pastors thinks his sermons are as good today as they were 10 years ago (they aren't). Sometimes the only way to make a point is to vote with your feet.
As an example, I'm involved in worship ministry, and one of the most frustrating things is the expectation that the person in the pew is to be "ministered to." The biblical injunctive is for us to worship God, then go minister to others.
As another example, I'm part of a relatively small church. I've lost track of the number of people who came for awhile, then left seeking another church with more youth programs, bigger worship ministry, etc. If all those people had stayed to help us build the ministry, we would have them all and more...
have a blessed day everyone and let's not allow these challenges to hinder us in the habit of meeting together...
Not that I think people should choose churches that they disagree with too much, or that exclude them or make them feel too uncomfortable, but I have limited patience for people who have a lot of criticism for churches but do not actually do something to help.