Culture At Large
Making sense of the body-hacking movement
What if we could improve the human body, rather than simply fix things that have broken? This is the motivating question for the so-called "body hacking" movement, also known as transhumanism. We have long since accepted the idea that we can use technology to repair and sustain our bodies — pacemakers to regulate heartbeats, artificial joints to enable movement, metal plates and rods to repair broken bones. What if we opened ourselves up to the possibility of other inventions?
The nascent body hacking movement is already beginning to suggest some of those possibilities, as a recent NPR article reported. Embedded microchips with personal information, smartphone passcodes, door lock codes and more may make life easier. LED light bulbs implanted into one’s hand may provide safety for those who run at night. Science fiction, of course, offers even more ideas, from data ports direct to the brain (Doctor Who) to Darth Vader’s cybernetic suit (Star Wars) to robotic endoskeletons enclosed in human flesh (Terminator).
At first glance, body hacking is so contrary to our expectations of “normal” behavior that there can be an almost visceral reaction. I have a hard time even looking at the image in the NPR story of LED implants in actual hands. Yet we need to move beyond a gut-level reaction and consider this trend thoughtfully. How do we make sense of body hacking and transhumanism, especially from a Christian perspective?
As Christians, we affirm that we are “fearfully and wonderfully made” and that we are created in the image of God. Christians also understand that that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and ought to be treated with respect. Yet I have no objection to those who choose to wear colored contact lenses or color their hair, both of which are, at their core, “body hacks” of a less technologically advanced variety.
A theologically sensitive approach to body hacking must affirm the goodness of our created bodies.
I would suggest that a theologically sensitive approach to body hacking must begin by affirming the goodness of our created bodies. While we should not necessarily reject body hacking outright, the foundation of the goodness of our bodies will naturally put limits on what we are willing to accept. We must be willing to weigh carefully what the potential benefits and harms of implanted technology may be. How would an implant improve our ability to fulfill our created purpose and serve God’s kingdom in this world?
A thoughtful approach to body hacking will also take seriously that we should treat our bodies with respect. “You are not your own; you were bought at a price,” Paul wrote. “Therefore honor God with your bodies.” Lining up to receive a microchip implant from a booth at a tech convention strikes me as irresponsible at best and downright dangerous at worst. Without research, testing and consideration of the communal ramifications of implants, I have a hard time recognizing body hacking as something that honors God with our bodies.
The communal dimension of body hacking is, perhaps, the most challenging aspect. The prophets of the Old Testament call God’s people to act justly. The idea of implanting a microchip in order to save two seconds of time unlocking my phone is the sort of investment of resources that smacks of privilege. Cybernetic technology is likely to further the divide between those who have access and means from those who don’t. Without much difficulty, we can imagine such technology used to corral and control others. As Christians we should think deeply about the questions of justice that accompany body hacking.
“Our World Belongs to God,” a contemporary testimony of the Christian Reformed Church in North America, offers these words of wisdom regarding technological advancements: “Grateful for advances in science and technology, we participate in their development, fostering care for creation and respect for the gift of life. We welcome discoveries that prevent or cure diseases and that help support healthy lives ... approaching each new discovery, whether of science or of medical technique, with careful thought, seeking the will of God.”
This seems to me like sound advice for thinking about body hacking, too.
Topics: Culture At Large, Science & Technology, Science, Technology, Theology & The Church, Theology